How to Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network Models for Human Activity Recognition

Last Updated on

Human activity recognition is the problem of classifying sequences of accelerometer data recorded by specialized harnesses or smart phones into known well-defined movements.

Classical approaches to the problem involve hand crafting features from the time series data based on fixed-sized windows and training machine learning models, such as ensembles of decision trees. The difficulty is that this feature engineering requires deep expertise in the field.

Recently, deep learning methods such as recurrent neural networks and one-dimensional convolutional neural networks, or CNNs, have been shown to provide state-of-the-art results on challenging activity recognition tasks with little or no data feature engineering, instead using feature learning on raw data.

In this tutorial, you will discover how to develop one-dimensional convolutional neural networks for time series classification on the problem of human activity recognition.

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

  • How to load and prepare the data for a standard human activity recognition dataset and develop a single 1D CNN model that achieves excellent performance on the raw data.
  • How to further tune the performance of the model, including data transformation, filter maps, and kernel sizes.
  • How to develop a sophisticated multi-headed one-dimensional convolutional neural network model that provides an ensemble-like result.

Discover how to build models for multivariate and multi-step time series forecasting with LSTMs and more in my new book, with 25 step-by-step tutorials and full source code.

Let’s get started.

How to Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network Models for Human Activity Recognition

How to Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network Models for Human Activity Recognition
Photo by Wolfgang Staudt, some rights reserved.

Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into four parts; they are:

  1. Activity Recognition Using Smartphones Dataset
  2. Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network
  3. Tuned 1D Convolutional Neural Network
  4. Multi-Headed 1D Convolutional Neural Network

Activity Recognition Using Smartphones Dataset

Human Activity Recognition, or HAR for short, is the problem of predicting what a person is doing based on a trace of their movement using sensors.

A standard human activity recognition dataset is the ‘Activity Recognition Using Smart Phones Dataset’ made available in 2012.

It was prepared and made available by Davide Anguita, et al. from the University of Genova, Italy and is described in full in their 2013 paper “A Public Domain Dataset for Human Activity Recognition Using Smartphones.” The dataset was modeled with machine learning algorithms in their 2012 paper titled “Human Activity Recognition on Smartphones using a Multiclass Hardware-Friendly Support Vector Machine.”

The dataset was made available and can be downloaded for free from the UCI Machine Learning Repository:

The data was collected from 30 subjects aged between 19 and 48 years old performing one of six standard activities while wearing a waist-mounted smartphone that recorded the movement data. Video was recorded of each subject performing the activities and the movement data was labeled manually from these videos.

Below is an example video of a subject performing the activities while their movement data is being recorded.

The six activities performed were as follows:

  1. Walking
  2. Walking Upstairs
  3. Walking Downstairs
  4. Sitting
  5. Standing
  6. Laying

The movement data recorded was the x, y, and z accelerometer data (linear acceleration) and gyroscopic data (angular velocity) from the smart phone, specifically a Samsung Galaxy S II. Observations were recorded at 50 Hz (i.e. 50 data points per second). Each subject performed the sequence of activities twice, once with the device on their left-hand-side and once with the device on their right-hand side.

The raw data is not available. Instead, a pre-processed version of the dataset was made available. The pre-processing steps included:

  • Pre-processing accelerometer and gyroscope using noise filters.
  • Splitting data into fixed windows of 2.56 seconds (128 data points) with 50% overlap.
  • Splitting of accelerometer data into gravitational (total) and body motion components.

Feature engineering was applied to the window data, and a copy of the data with these engineered features was made available.

A number of time and frequency features commonly used in the field of human activity recognition were extracted from each window. The result was a 561 element vector of features.

The dataset was split into train (70%) and test (30%) sets based on data for subjects, e.g. 21 subjects for train and nine for test.

Experiment results with a support vector machine intended for use on a smartphone (e.g. fixed-point arithmetic) resulted in a predictive accuracy of 89% on the test dataset, achieving similar results as an unmodified SVM implementation.

The dataset is freely available and can be downloaded from the UCI Machine Learning repository.

The data is provided as a single zip file that is about 58 megabytes in size. The direct link for this download is below:

Download the dataset and unzip all files into a new directory in your current working directory named “HARDataset”.

Need help with Deep Learning for Time Series?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

Download Your FREE Mini-Course

Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network

In this section, we will develop a one-dimensional convolutional neural network model (1D CNN) for the human activity recognition dataset.

Convolutional neural network models were developed for image classification problems, where the model learns an internal representation of a two-dimensional input, in a process referred to as feature learning.

This same process can be harnessed on one-dimensional sequences of data, such as in the case of acceleration and gyroscopic data for human activity recognition. The model learns to extract features from sequences of observations and how to map the internal features to different activity types.

The benefit of using CNNs for sequence classification is that they can learn from the raw time series data directly, and in turn do not require domain expertise to manually engineer input features. The model can learn an internal representation of the time series data and ideally achieve comparable performance to models fit on a version of the dataset with engineered features.

This section is divided into 4 parts; they are:

  1. Load Data
  2. Fit and Evaluate Model
  3. Summarize Results
  4. Complete Example

Load Data

The first step is to load the raw dataset into memory.

There are three main signal types in the raw data: total acceleration, body acceleration, and body gyroscope. Each has three axes of data. This means that there are a total of nine variables for each time step.

Further, each series of data has been partitioned into overlapping windows of 2.65 seconds of data, or 128 time steps. These windows of data correspond to the windows of engineered features (rows) in the previous section.

This means that one row of data has (128 * 9), or 1,152, elements. This is a little less than double the size of the 561 element vectors in the previous section and it is likely that there is some redundant data.

The signals are stored in the /Inertial Signals/ directory under the train and test subdirectories. Each axis of each signal is stored in a separate file, meaning that each of the train and test datasets have nine input files to load and one output file to load. We can batch the loading of these files into groups given the consistent directory structures and file naming conventions.

The input data is in CSV format where columns are separated by whitespace. Each of these files can be loaded as a NumPy array. The load_file() function below loads a dataset given the file path to the file and returns the loaded data as a NumPy array.

We can then load all data for a given group (train or test) into a single three-dimensional NumPy array, where the dimensions of the array are [samples, time steps, features].

To make this clearer, there are 128 time steps and nine features, where the number of samples is the number of rows in any given raw signal data file.

The load_group() function below implements this behavior. The dstack() NumPy function allows us to stack each of the loaded 3D arrays into a single 3D array where the variables are separated on the third dimension (features).

We can use this function to load all input signal data for a given group, such as train or test.

The load_dataset_group() function below loads all input signal data and the output data for a single group using the consistent naming conventions between the train and test directories.

Finally, we can load each of the train and test datasets.

The output data is defined as an integer for the class number. We must one hot encode these class integers so that the data is suitable for fitting a neural network multi-class classification model. We can do this by calling the to_categorical() Keras function.

The load_dataset() function below implements this behavior and returns the train and test X and y elements ready for fitting and evaluating the defined models.

Fit and Evaluate Model

Now that we have the data loaded into memory ready for modeling, we can define, fit, and evaluate a 1D CNN model.

We can define a function named evaluate_model() that takes the train and test dataset, fits a model on the training dataset, evaluates it on the test dataset, and returns an estimate of the models performance.

First, we must define the CNN model using the Keras deep learning library. The model requires a three-dimensional input with [samples, time steps, features].

This is exactly how we have loaded the data, where one sample is one window of the time series data, each window has 128 time steps, and a time step has nine variables or features.

The output for the model will be a six-element vector containing the probability of a given window belonging to each of the six activity types.

These input and output dimensions are required when fitting the model, and we can extract them from the provided training dataset.

The model is defined as a Sequential Keras model, for simplicity.

We will define the model as having two 1D CNN layers, followed by a dropout layer for regularization, then a pooling layer. It is common to define CNN layers in groups of two in order to give the model a good chance of learning features from the input data. CNNs learn very quickly, so the dropout layer is intended to help slow down the learning process and hopefully result in a better final model. The pooling layer reduces the learned features to 1/4 their size, consolidating them to only the most essential elements.

After the CNN and pooling, the learned features are flattened to one long vector and pass through a fully connected layer before the output layer used to make a prediction. The fully connected layer ideally provides a buffer between the learned features and the output with the intent of interpreting the learned features before making a prediction.

For this model, we will use a standard configuration of 64 parallel feature maps and a kernel size of 3. The feature maps are the number of times the input is processed or interpreted, whereas the kernel size is the number of input time steps considered as the input sequence is read or processed onto the feature maps.

The efficient Adam version of stochastic gradient descent will be used to optimize the network, and the categorical cross entropy loss function will be used given that we are learning a multi-class classification problem.

The definition of the model is listed below.

The model is fit for a fixed number of epochs, in this case 10, and a batch size of 32 samples will be used, where 32 windows of data will be exposed to the model before the weights of the model are updated.

Once the model is fit, it is evaluated on the test dataset and the accuracy of the fit model on the test dataset is returned.

The complete evaluate_model() function is listed below.

There is nothing special about the network structure or chosen hyperparameters; they are just a starting point for this problem.

Summarize Results

We cannot judge the skill of the model from a single evaluation.

The reason for this is that neural networks are stochastic, meaning that a different specific model will result when training the same model configuration on the same data.

This is a feature of the network in that it gives the model its adaptive ability, but requires a slightly more complicated evaluation of the model.

We will repeat the evaluation of the model multiple times, then summarize the performance of the model across each of those runs. For example, we can call evaluate_model() a total of 10 times. This will result in a population of model evaluation scores that must be summarized.

We can summarize the sample of scores by calculating and reporting the mean and standard deviation of the performance. The mean gives the average accuracy of the model on the dataset, whereas the standard deviation gives the average variance of the accuracy from the mean.

The function summarize_results() below summarizes the results of a run.

We can bundle up the repeated evaluation, gathering of results, and summarization of results into a main function for the experiment, called run_experiment(), listed below.

By default, the model is evaluated 10 times before the performance of the model is reported.

Complete Example

Now that we have all of the pieces, we can tie them together into a worked example.

The complete code listing is provided below.

Running the example first prints the shape of the loaded dataset, then the shape of the train and test sets and the input and output elements. This confirms the number of samples, time steps, and variables, as well as the number of classes.

Next, models are created and evaluated and a debug message is printed for each.

Finally, the sample of scores is printed followed by the mean and standard deviation. We can see that the model performed well achieving a classification accuracy of about 90.9% trained on the raw dataset, with a standard deviation of about 1.3.

This is a good result, considering that the original paper published a result of 89%, trained on the dataset with heavy domain-specific feature engineering, not the raw dataset.

Note: Given the stochastic nature of the algorithm, your specific results may vary.

Now that we have seen how to load the data and fit a 1D CNN model, we can investigate whether we can further lift the skill of the model with some hyperparameter tuning.

Tuned 1D Convolutional Neural Network

In this section, we will tune the model in an effort to further improve performance on the problem.

We will look at three main areas:

  1. Data Preparation
  2. Number of Filters
  3. Size of Kernel

Data Preparation

In the previous section, we did not perform any data preparation. We used the data as-is.

Each of the main sets of data (body acceleration, body gyroscopic, and total acceleration) have been scaled to the range -1, 1. It is not clear if the data was scaled per-subject or across all subjects.

One possible transform that may result in an improvement is to standardize the observations prior to fitting a model.

Standardization refers to shifting the distribution of each variable such that it has a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. It really only makes sense if the distribution of each variable is Gaussian.

We can quickly check the distribution of each variable by plotting a histogram of each variable in the training dataset.

A minor difficulty in this is that the data has been split into windows of 128 time steps, with a 50% overlap. Therefore, in order to get a fair idea of the data distribution, we must first remove the duplicated observations (the overlap), then remove the windowing of the data.

We can do this using NumPy, first slicing the array and only keeping the second half of each window, then flattening the windows into a long vector for each variable. This is quick and dirty and does mean that we lose the data in the first half of the first window.

The complete example of loading the data, flattening it, and plotting a histogram for each of the nine variables is listed below.

Running the example creates a figure with nine histogram plots, one for each variable in the training dataset.

The order of the plots matches the order in which the data was loaded, specifically:

  1. Total Acceleration x
  2. Total Acceleration y
  3. Total Acceleration z
  4. Body Acceleration x
  5. Body Acceleration y
  6. Body Acceleration z
  7. Body Gyroscope x
  8. Body Gyroscope y
  9. Body Gyroscope z

We can see that each variable has a Gaussian-like distribution, except perhaps the first variable (Total Acceleration x).

The distributions of total acceleration data is flatter than the body data, which is more pointed.

We could explore using a power transform on the data to make the distributions more Gaussian, although this is left as an exercise.

Histograms of each variable in the training data set

Histograms of each variable in the training data set

The data is sufficiently Gaussian-like to explore whether a standardization transform will help the model extract salient signal from the raw observations.

The function below named scale_data() can be used to standardize the data prior to fitting and evaluating the model. The StandardScaler scikit-learn class will be used to perform the transform. It is first fit on the training data (e.g. to find the mean and standard deviation for each variable), then applied to the train and test sets.

The standardization is optional, so we can apply the process and compare the results to the same code path without the standardization in a controlled experiment.

We can update the evaluate_model() function to take a parameter, then use this parameter to decide whether or not to perform the standardization.

We can also update the run_experiment() to repeat the experiment 10 times for each parameter; in this case, only two parameters will be evaluated [False, True] for no standardization and standardization respectively.

This will result in two samples of results that can be compared.

We will update the summarize_results() function to summarize the sample of results for each configuration parameter and to create a boxplot to compare each sample of results.

These updates will allow us to directly compare the results of a model fit as before and a model fit on the dataset after it has been standardized.

It is also a generic change that will allow us to evaluate and compare the results of other sets of parameters in the following sections.

The complete code listing is provided below.

Running the example may take a few minutes, depending on your hardware.

The performance is printed for each evaluated model. At the end of the run, the performance of each of the tested configurations is summarized showing the mean and the standard deviation.

We can see that it does look like standardizing the dataset prior to modeling does result in a small lift in performance from about 90.4% accuracy (close to what we saw in the previous section) to about 91.5% accuracy.

Note: Given the stochastic nature of the algorithm, your specific results may vary.

A box and whisker plot of the results is also created.

This allows the two samples of results to be compared in a nonparametric way, showing the median and the middle 50% of each sample.

We can see that the distribution of results with standardization is quite different from the distribution of results without standardization. This is likely a real effect.

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with and without standardization

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with and without standardization

Number of Filters

Now that we have an experimental framework, we can explore varying other hyperparameters of the model.

An important hyperparameter for the CNN is the number of filter maps. We can experiment with a range of different values, from less to many more than the 64 used in the first model that we developed.

Specifically, we will try the following numbers of feature maps:

We can use the same code from the previous section and update the evaluate_model() function to use the provided parameter as the number of filters in the Conv1D layers. We can also update the summarize_results() function to save the boxplot as exp_cnn_filters.png.

The complete code example is listed below.

Running the example repeats the experiment for each of the specified number of filters.

At the end of the run, a summary of the results with each number of filters is presented.

We can see perhaps a trend of increasing average performance with the increase in the number of filter maps. The variance stays pretty constant, and perhaps 128 feature maps might be a good configuration for the network.

A box and whisker plot of the results is also created, allowing the distribution of results with each number of filters to be compared.

From the plot, we can see the trend upward in terms of median classification accuracy (orange line on the box) with the increase in the number of feature maps. We do see a dip at 64 feature maps (the default or baseline in our experiments), which is surprising, and perhaps a plateau in accuracy across 32, 128, and 256 filter maps. Perhaps 32 would be a more stable configuration.

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with different numbers of filter maps

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with different numbers of filter maps

Size of Kernel

The size of the kernel is another important hyperparameter of the 1D CNN to tune.

The kernel size controls the number of time steps consider in each “read” of the input sequence, that is then projected onto the feature map (via the convolutional process).

A large kernel size means a less rigorous reading of the data, but may result in a more generalized snapshot of the input.

We can use the same experimental set-up and test a suite of different kernel sizes in addition to the default of three time steps. The full list of values is as follows:

The complete code listing is provided below:

Running the example tests each kernel size in turn.

The results are summarized at the end of the run. We can see a general increase in model performance with the increase in kernel size.

The results suggest a kernel size of 5 might be good with a mean skill of about 91.8%, but perhaps a size of 7 or 11 may also be just as good with a smaller standard deviation.

A box and whisker plot of the results is also created.

The results suggest that a larger kernel size does appear to result in better accuracy and that perhaps a kernel size of 7 provides a good balance between good performance and low variance.

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with different numbers of kernel sizes

Box and whisker plot of 1D CNN with different numbers of kernel sizes

This is just the beginning of tuning the model, although we have focused on perhaps the more important elements. It might be interesting to explore combinations of some of the above findings to see if performance can be lifted even further.

It may also be interesting to increase the number of repeats from 10 to 30 or more to see if it results in more stable findings.

Multi-Headed Convolutional Neural Network

Another popular approach with CNNs is to have a multi-headed model, where each head of the model reads the input time steps using a different sized kernel.

For example, a three-headed model may have three different kernel sizes of 3, 5, 11, allowing the model to read and interpret the sequence data at three different resolutions. The interpretations from all three heads are then concatenated within the model and interpreted by a fully-connected layer before a prediction is made.

We can implement a multi-headed 1D CNN using the Keras functional API. For a gentle introduction to this API, see the post:

The updated version of the evaluate_model() function is listed below that creates a three-headed CNN model.

We can see that each head of the model is the same structure, although the kernel size is varied. The three heads then feed into a single merge layer before being interpreted prior to making a prediction.

When the model is created, a plot of the network architecture is created; provided below, it gives a clear idea of how the constructed model fits together.

Plot of the Multi-Headed 1D Convolutional Neural Network

Plot of the Multi-Headed 1D Convolutional Neural Network

Other aspects of the model could be varied across the heads, such as the number of filters or even the preparation of the data itself.

The complete code example with the multi-headed 1D CNN is listed below.

Running the example prints the performance of the model each repeat of the experiment and then summarizes the estimated score as the mean and standard deviation, as we did in the first case with the simple 1D CNN.

We can see that the average performance of the model is about 91.6% classification accuracy with a standard deviation of about 0.8.

This example may be used as the basis for exploring a variety of other models that vary different model hyperparameters and even different data preparation schemes across the input heads.

It would not be an apples-to-apples comparison to compare this result with a single-headed CNN given the relative tripling of the resources in this model. Perhaps an apples-to-apples comparison would be a model with the same architecture and the same number of filters across each input head of the model.


This section lists some ideas for extending the tutorial that you may wish to explore.

  • Date Preparation. Explore other data preparation schemes such as data normalization and perhaps normalization after standardization.
  • Network Architecture. Explore other network architectures, such as deeper CNN architectures and deeper fully-connected layers for interpreting the CNN input features.
  • Diagnostics. Use simple learning curve diagnostics to interpret how the model is learning over the epochs and whether more regularization, different learning rates, or different batch sizes or numbers of epochs may result in a better performing or more stable model.

If you explore any of these extensions, I’d love to know.

Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.




In this tutorial, you discovered how to develop one-dimensional convolutional neural networks for time series classification on the problem of human activity recognition.

Specifically, you learned:

  • How to load and prepare the data for a standard human activity recognition dataset and develop a single 1D CNN model that achieves excellent performance on the raw data.
  • How to further tune the performance of the model, including data transformation, filter maps, and kernel sizes.
  • How to develop a sophisticated multi-headed one-dimensional convolutional neural network model that provides an ensemble-like result.

Do you have any questions?
Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Develop Deep Learning models for Time Series Today!

Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting

Develop Your Own Forecasting models in Minutes

...with just a few lines of python code

Discover how in my new Ebook:
Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting

It provides self-study tutorials on topics like:
CNNs, LSTMs, Multivariate Forecasting, Multi-Step Forecasting and much more...

Finally Bring Deep Learning to your Time Series Forecasting Projects

Skip the Academics. Just Results.

See What's Inside

50 Responses to How to Develop 1D Convolutional Neural Network Models for Human Activity Recognition

  1. Irati October 10, 2018 at 7:45 pm #

    Hi Jason,
    Both this post and your book are great! I have a question though:
    In my case, although the database has similar structure to the one of the example, due to the nature of the environment the dataset is small.
    I have been digging but I could not find a nice approach for the data augmentation problem where the case of study are multivariate time series.

    Any suggestion?

    Thanks for your work!

    • Jason Brownlee October 11, 2018 at 7:54 am #


      A good starting point might be to add Gaussian noise to the input samples.

  2. Yang October 31, 2018 at 1:55 pm #

    Hi Jason,

    I made a data set and trained it with CNN. The training accuracy was close to 1, but the verification accuracy remained around 0.55. Loss of verification decreased first and then increased. Is this an over-fitting problem? However, data augmentation and regularization have no effect. Do you have any good suggestions?.

    Look forward to your reply!

    • Jason Brownlee October 31, 2018 at 2:57 pm #

      Sounds like overfitting.

      Try a large model and use weight regularization and early stopping against a validation dataset.

      • Yang October 31, 2018 at 5:55 pm #

        Weight regularization can stabilize the loss of the validation, but the validation accuracy has not been improved, keeping about 0.55. And The validation accuracyis around 0.55 during of the whole training process, so early stopping also have no effect. How to improve the verification accuracy?

  3. Lukas November 24, 2018 at 9:13 pm #


    First of all – thanks for this amazing post. I am stuck with a certain problem at the moment and was wondering whether you could give me your thoughts on this.
    I am analyzing a Time Series with only 1 feature. The Keras 1D Convolutional Layer does, however, require a matrix as the input. Does it make sense to split the 1D Time Series up in smaller Subvectors? And what exactly are the implications of this?

    Thanks in advance!

    • Jason Brownlee November 25, 2018 at 6:55 am #

      Yes, it can make sense. The implications can only be assessed in the context of your specific problem.

  4. ravi jagannathan December 6, 2018 at 11:06 am #

    you have 9 features but they are not independent. body Acc = Total Acc – gravity
    where gravity is constant. So this should have led to errors ?

  5. AT February 2, 2019 at 10:46 am #

    Thanks Jason for this amazing post! I have a pretty similar dataset with over 1700 samples, each has 9 features (orientation,acceleration, velocity in x,y,z) over 128 timestamps and I need to predict the surface (concrete, tiles, carpet…9 in total) that the sample is moving in

    I have taken the who dataset as it is and apply CNN. The acc and val_acc doesn’t increase from 60% after around 20 epochs.

    Do you have any idea how should I work with these type of sensor data? Your insights can make a difference in my project.

    • Jason Brownlee February 3, 2019 at 6:12 am #

      Generally, I recommend testing a suite of models and different configurations for each approach in order to discover what works best for your specific problem.

      I’m eager to hear how you go with your project.

  6. Hayden March 28, 2019 at 10:35 pm #

    Hi Jason,

    Thanks for an amazing post. I’m currently working on a similar-ish problem using vehicle acceleration and exploring the use of 1D Covnets. What I want to know is why didn’t you use a validation set during the model fitting?

  7. Manisha April 10, 2019 at 6:50 am #

    Hi sir,

    We are evaluating neural models here say 10 times to get the accuracy and stddev because of their stochastic nature….if i want to plot a confusion matrix then how to proceed abt that here since we have trained 10 models here…

    • Manisha April 10, 2019 at 6:52 am #

      Also if i want to plot loss vs epochs to check overfitting how to do here?

      • Jason Brownlee April 10, 2019 at 1:43 pm #

        You can plot the learning curve for a single run, or plot all the curves for multiple runs on a single plot.

    • Jason Brownlee April 10, 2019 at 1:42 pm #

      Good question.

      A confusion matrix is based on a single run of the model and evaluation against a single test dataset.

      • Manisha Bhattacharya April 10, 2019 at 9:55 pm #

        So it means sir here it is not feasible to plot confusion matrix as we are evaluating the model 10 times…because every time confusion matrix will be different?

  8. Manisha April 10, 2019 at 9:57 pm #

    Hi Sir,

    In all the above analysis how u r sure that the model is not overfitting without plotting it?

    • Jason Brownlee April 11, 2019 at 6:38 am #

      I’m not 100% sure now.

      I did inspect plots of loss when developing the code though.

      • Manisha April 12, 2019 at 7:11 pm #

        Sir, if i evaluate the model say 30 times and take the mean accuracy as done above but say out of those 30 evaluations my model overfitted in some cases( by seeing loss vs epoch plot) then shall i still take the mean accuracy as my final outcome?

  9. Manisha April 11, 2019 at 4:04 am #

    Sir one more doubt…we are saying that the model is stochastic and everytime it is giving different results…but why is so?

    is it because of the weights we are assigning in the beginning as it changes everytime?
    keras by default uses glorot uniform….so everytime we assign a different weight from glorot uniform and that is why our model is stochastic?

  10. Manisha April 13, 2019 at 12:16 am #

    Sir, we can also use gridsearch cv here with keras wrapper for tuning paramters like kernals and size of kernals right?

    any difference then in both the approaches….shown above and the gridsearch one ? apart from cross validation that we can use in grid search….

    • Jason Brownlee April 13, 2019 at 6:32 am #


      I recommend grid searching manually with neural nets to have more control over the process.

  11. Rene May 2, 2019 at 4:03 am #

    Hi Jason,

    First of all many thanks for sharing all your knowledge and insights.
    I have a question for you. What are the default filters/kernel used by Keras in the case of a 1D CNN ?

    • Jason Brownlee May 2, 2019 at 8:08 am #

      There are no defaults for these hyperparameters, you must specify filter size and number of filters.

  12. Matt June 14, 2019 at 8:15 pm #

    Hi Jason

    Is it possible to have a prediction for the regression problem regarding your script? if so, can you please explain what exactly should be changed in the code? Thanks.


  13. vinodh June 21, 2019 at 9:23 pm #

    Hi, nice blog post, can we use conv2d for this problem, if not why? can you explain briefly?

  14. Jhony July 3, 2019 at 8:27 pm #

    Dear Jason,

    Am I missing something because this network should give result to be something of those 6 activities, from this example accuracy is very good, how to use this model on new dataset with no labels so we can see how it predicts activities ?

  15. ICHaLiL July 7, 2019 at 4:57 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Can we use TimeDistributed layer after Flatten instead of Dense layer? Have you got any example about it. Because When I try to use it, always I get different errors.


  16. Colin August 7, 2019 at 12:45 am #

    This may not be the place to ask this, but it’s driving me crazy. Pandas is giving me FileNotFoundError even though the files are definitely in place. Anybody else having this issue? I’ve tried using absolute paths instead but not change.

  17. Eric August 10, 2019 at 12:48 am #

    Thank you for the great tutorial.

    I notice that a lot of papers or tutorials visually depict their models from input to convolution to output and everything in between. I was trying to recreate one of these diagrams but was having difficulty visualizing this one.

    For example:

    Have you created something like this for this model?

  18. Mohammad September 4, 2019 at 12:42 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Thanks for your helpful post. May I ask whether there is any source for the theoretical aspects of CNN 1D? Any kinds of help are much appreciated.

    • Jason Brownlee September 4, 2019 at 6:00 am #

      Like what exactly?

      Perhaps the deep learning textbook.

  19. smitha September 14, 2019 at 2:50 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Your tutorials are very helpful and informative too. It solved a lot of doubts that I had. However, most of the examples are based on image datasets. I am not so sure going about parameters passing for tabular data. Could you please make a tutorial for CNN and LSTM on binary classification and external dataset testing with K fold validation?

    Thanks a lot.

  20. Frank September 18, 2019 at 5:03 am #

    Hi Jason, thanks for your post.
    why use an LSTM for the same set of data (as you showed in another post) you get a worse result?

    • Jason Brownlee September 18, 2019 at 6:31 am #

      The tutorials show how to use the models, rather than how to get the best result for a standard dataset.

      • Frank September 18, 2019 at 7:06 am #

        I’m sorry, maybe I didn’t explain myself well.

        In this article you use a CNN, obtaining an accuracy = 90.78
        In another article you used an LSTM network, but you got less accuracy (89.78).

        My questions are:

        1. Was this result (CNN offers better accuracy) predictable on a theoretical basis, before training the model, taking into consideration only TYPE OF THE NETWORK and the TYPE OF DATASET?

        2. If we built a new neural network, using both LSTM layer and CNN layer, would we probably get better results? Why?

        Thanks for your attention. This information is very important to me.

Leave a Reply