Given the rise of smart electricity meters and the wide adoption of electricity generation technology like solar panels, there is a wealth of electricity usage data available.

This data represents a multivariate time series of power-related variables that in turn could be used to model and even forecast future electricity consumption.

Autocorrelation models are very simple and can provide a fast and effective way to make skillful one-step and multi-step forecasts for electricity consumption.

In this tutorial, you will discover how to develop and evaluate an autoregression model for multi-step forecasting household power consumption.

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

- How to create and analyze autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots for univariate time series data.
- How to use the findings from autocorrelation plots to configure an autoregression model.
- How to develop and evaluate an autocorrelation model used to make one-week forecasts.

Let’s get started.

## Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into five parts; they are:

- Problem Description
- Load and Prepare Dataset
- Model Evaluation
- Autocorrelation Analysis
- Develop an Autoregression Model

## Problem Description

The ‘Household Power Consumption‘ dataset is a multivariate time series dataset that describes the electricity consumption for a single household over four years.

The data was collected between December 2006 and November 2010 and observations of power consumption within the household were collected every minute.

It is a multivariate series comprised of seven variables (besides the date and time); they are:

**global_active_power**: The total active power consumed by the household (kilowatts).**global_reactive_power**: The total reactive power consumed by the household (kilowatts).**voltage**: Average voltage (volts).**global_intensity**: Average current intensity (amps).**sub_metering_1**: Active energy for kitchen (watt-hours of active energy).**sub_metering_2**: Active energy for laundry (watt-hours of active energy).**sub_metering_3**: Active energy for climate control systems (watt-hours of active energy).

Active and reactive energy refer to the technical details of alternative current.

A fourth sub-metering variable can be created by subtracting the sum of three defined sub-metering variables from the total active energy as follows:

1 |
sub_metering_remainder = (global_active_power * 1000 / 60) - (sub_metering_1 + sub_metering_2 + sub_metering_3) |

## Load and Prepare Dataset

The dataset can be downloaded from the UCI Machine Learning repository as a single 20 megabyte .zip file:

Download the dataset and unzip it into your current working directory. You will now have the file “*household_power_consumption.txt*” that is about 127 megabytes in size and contains all of the observations.

We can use the *read_csv()* function to load the data and combine the first two columns into a single date-time column that we can use as an index.

1 2 |
# load all data dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption.txt', sep=';', header=0, low_memory=False, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates={'datetime':[0,1]}, index_col=['datetime']) |

Next, we can mark all missing values indicated with a ‘*?*‘ character with a *NaN* value, which is a float.

This will allow us to work with the data as one array of floating point values rather than mixed types (less efficient.)

1 2 3 4 |
# mark all missing values dataset.replace('?', nan, inplace=True) # make dataset numeric dataset = dataset.astype('float32') |

We also need to fill in the missing values now that they have been marked.

A very simple approach would be to copy the observation from the same time the day before. We can implement this in a function named *fill_missing()* that will take the NumPy array of the data and copy values from exactly 24 hours ago.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
# fill missing values with a value at the same time one day ago def fill_missing(values): one_day = 60 * 24 for row in range(values.shape[0]): for col in range(values.shape[1]): if isnan(values[row, col]): values[row, col] = values[row - one_day, col] |

We can apply this function directly to the data within the DataFrame.

1 2 |
# fill missing fill_missing(dataset.values) |

Now we can create a new column that contains the remainder of the sub-metering, using the calculation from the previous section.

1 2 3 |
# add a column for for the remainder of sub metering values = dataset.values dataset['sub_metering_4'] = (values[:,0] * 1000 / 60) - (values[:,4] + values[:,5] + values[:,6]) |

We can now save the cleaned-up version of the dataset to a new file; in this case we will just change the file extension to .csv and save the dataset as ‘*household_power_consumption.csv*‘.

1 2 |
# save updated dataset dataset.to_csv('household_power_consumption.csv') |

Tying all of this together, the complete example of loading, cleaning-up, and saving the dataset is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |
# load and clean-up data from numpy import nan from numpy import isnan from pandas import read_csv from pandas import to_numeric # fill missing values with a value at the same time one day ago def fill_missing(values): one_day = 60 * 24 for row in range(values.shape[0]): for col in range(values.shape[1]): if isnan(values[row, col]): values[row, col] = values[row - one_day, col] # load all data dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption.txt', sep=';', header=0, low_memory=False, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates={'datetime':[0,1]}, index_col=['datetime']) # mark all missing values dataset.replace('?', nan, inplace=True) # make dataset numeric dataset = dataset.astype('float32') # fill missing fill_missing(dataset.values) # add a column for for the remainder of sub metering values = dataset.values dataset['sub_metering_4'] = (values[:,0] * 1000 / 60) - (values[:,4] + values[:,5] + values[:,6]) # save updated dataset dataset.to_csv('household_power_consumption.csv') |

Running the example creates the new file ‘*household_power_consumption.csv*‘ that we can use as the starting point for our modeling project.

### Need help with Deep Learning for Time Series?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

## Model Evaluation

In this section, we will consider how we can develop and evaluate predictive models for the household power dataset.

This section is divided into four parts; they are:

- Problem Framing
- Evaluation Metric
- Train and Test Sets
- Walk-Forward Validation

### Problem Framing

There are many ways to harness and explore the household power consumption dataset.

In this tutorial, we will use the data to explore a very specific question; that is:

Given recent power consumption, what is the expected power consumption for the week ahead?

This requires that a predictive model forecast the total active power for each day over the next seven days.

Technically, this framing of the problem is referred to as a multi-step time series forecasting problem, given the multiple forecast steps. A model that makes use of multiple input variables may be referred to as a multivariate multi-step time series forecasting model.

A model of this type could be helpful within the household in planning expenditures. It could also be helpful on the supply side for planning electricity demand for a specific household.

This framing of the dataset also suggests that it would be useful to downsample the per-minute observations of power consumption to daily totals. This is not required, but makes sense, given that we are interested in total power per day.

We can achieve this easily using the resample() function on the pandas DataFrame. Calling this function with the argument ‘*D*‘ allows the loaded data indexed by date-time to be grouped by day (see all offset aliases). We can then calculate the sum of all observations for each day and create a new dataset of daily power consumption data for each of the eight variables.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
# resample minute data to total for each day from pandas import read_csv # load the new file dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption.csv', header=0, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates=['datetime'], index_col=['datetime']) # resample data to daily daily_groups = dataset.resample('D') daily_data = daily_groups.sum() # summarize print(daily_data.shape) print(daily_data.head()) # save daily_data.to_csv('household_power_consumption_days.csv') |

Running the example creates a new daily total power consumption dataset and saves the result into a separate file named ‘*household_power_consumption_days.csv*‘.

We can use this as the dataset for fitting and evaluating predictive models for the chosen framing of the problem.

### Evaluation Metric

A forecast will be comprised of seven values, one for each day of the week ahead.

It is common with multi-step forecasting problems to evaluate each forecasted time step separately. This is helpful for a few reasons:

- To comment on the skill at a specific lead time (e.g. +1 day vs +3 days).
- To contrast models based on their skills at different lead times (e.g. models good at +1 day vs models good at days +5).

The units of the total power are kilowatts and it would be useful to have an error metric that was also in the same units. Both Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) fit this bill, although RMSE is more commonly used and will be adopted in this tutorial. Unlike MAE, RMSE is more punishing of forecast errors.

The performance metric for this problem will be the RMSE for each lead time from day 1 to day 7.

As a short-cut, it may be useful to summarize the performance of a model using a single score in order to aide in model selection.

One possible score that could be used would be the RMSE across all forecast days.

The function *evaluate_forecasts()* below will implement this behavior and return the performance of a model based on multiple seven-day forecasts.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
# evaluate one or more weekly forecasts against expected values def evaluate_forecasts(actual, predicted): scores = list() # calculate an RMSE score for each day for i in range(actual.shape[1]): # calculate mse mse = mean_squared_error(actual[:, i], predicted[:, i]) # calculate rmse rmse = sqrt(mse) # store scores.append(rmse) # calculate overall RMSE s = 0 for row in range(actual.shape[0]): for col in range(actual.shape[1]): s += (actual[row, col] - predicted[row, col])**2 score = sqrt(s / (actual.shape[0] * actual.shape[1])) return score, scores |

Running the function will first return the overall RMSE regardless of day, then an array of RMSE scores for each day.

### Train and Test Sets

We will use the first three years of data for training predictive models and the final year for evaluating models.

The data in a given dataset will be divided into standard weeks. These are weeks that begin on a Sunday and end on a Saturday.

This is a realistic and useful way for using the chosen framing of the model, where the power consumption for the week ahead can be predicted. It is also helpful with modeling, where models can be used to predict a specific day (e.g. Wednesday) or the entire sequence.

We will split the data into standard weeks, working backwards from the test dataset.

The final year of the data is in 2010 and the first Sunday for 2010 was January 3rd. The data ends in mid November 2010 and the closest final Saturday in the data is November 20th. This gives 46 weeks of test data.

The first and last rows of daily data for the test dataset are provided below for confirmation.

1 2 3 |
2010-01-03,2083.4539999999984,191.61000000000055,350992.12000000034,8703.600000000033,3842.0,4920.0,10074.0,15888.233355799992 ... 2010-11-20,2197.006000000004,153.76800000000028,346475.9999999998,9320.20000000002,4367.0,2947.0,11433.0,17869.76663959999 |

The daily data starts in late 2006.

The first Sunday in the dataset is December 17th, which is the second row of data.

Organizing the data into standard weeks gives 159 full standard weeks for training a predictive model.

1 2 3 |
2006-12-17,3390.46,226.0059999999994,345725.32000000024,14398.59999999998,2033.0,4187.0,13341.0,36946.66673200004 ... 2010-01-02,1309.2679999999998,199.54600000000016,352332.8399999997,5489.7999999999865,801.0,298.0,6425.0,14297.133406600002 |

The function *split_dataset()* below splits the daily data into train and test sets and organizes each into standard weeks.

Specific row offsets are used to split the data using knowledge of the dataset. The split datasets are then organized into weekly data using the NumPy split() function.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
# split a univariate dataset into train/test sets def split_dataset(data): # split into standard weeks train, test = data[1:-328], data[-328:-6] # restructure into windows of weekly data train = array(split(train, len(train)/7)) test = array(split(test, len(test)/7)) return train, test |

We can test this function out by loading the daily dataset and printing the first and last rows of data from both the train and test sets to confirm they match the expectations above.

The complete code example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
# split into standard weeks from numpy import split from numpy import array from pandas import read_csv # split a univariate dataset into train/test sets def split_dataset(data): # split into standard weeks train, test = data[1:-328], data[-328:-6] # restructure into windows of weekly data train = array(split(train, len(train)/7)) test = array(split(test, len(test)/7)) return train, test # load the new file dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption_days.csv', header=0, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates=['datetime'], index_col=['datetime']) train, test = split_dataset(dataset.values) # validate train data print(train.shape) print(train[0, 0, 0], train[-1, -1, 0]) # validate test print(test.shape) print(test[0, 0, 0], test[-1, -1, 0]) |

Running the example shows that indeed the train dataset has 159 weeks of data, whereas the test dataset has 46 weeks.

We can see that the total active power for the train and test dataset for the first and last rows match the data for the specific dates that we defined as the bounds on the standard weeks for each set.

1 2 3 4 |
(159, 7, 8) 3390.46 1309.2679999999998 (46, 7, 8) 2083.4539999999984 2197.006000000004 |

### Walk-Forward Validation

Models will be evaluated using a scheme called walk-forward validation.

This is where a model is required to make a one week prediction, then the actual data for that week is made available to the model so that it can be used as the basis for making a prediction on the subsequent week. This is both realistic for how the model may be used in practice and beneficial to the models allowing them to make use of the best available data.

We can demonstrate this below with separation of input data and output/predicted data.

1 2 3 4 5 |
Input, Predict [Week1] Week2 [Week1 + Week2] Week3 [Week1 + Week2 + Week3] Week4 ... |

The walk-forward validation approach to evaluating predictive models on this dataset is implement below, named *evaluate_model()*.

The name of a function is provided for the model as the argument “*model_func*“. This function is responsible for defining the model, fitting the model on the training data, and making a one-week forecast.

The forecasts made by the model are then evaluated against the test dataset using the previously defined *evaluate_forecasts()* function.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
# evaluate a single model def evaluate_model(model_func, train, test): # history is a list of weekly data history = [x for x in train] # walk-forward validation over each week predictions = list() for i in range(len(test)): # predict the week yhat_sequence = model_func(history) # store the predictions predictions.append(yhat_sequence) # get real observation and add to history for predicting the next week history.append(test[i, :]) predictions = array(predictions) # evaluate predictions days for each week score, scores = evaluate_forecasts(test[:, :, 0], predictions) return score, scores |

Once we have the evaluation for a model, we can summarize the performance.

The function below named *summarize_scores()* will display the performance of a model as a single line for easy comparison with other models.

1 2 3 4 |
# summarize scores def summarize_scores(name, score, scores): s_scores = ', '.join(['%.1f' % s for s in scores]) print('%s: [%.3f] %s' % (name, score, s_scores)) |

We now have all of the elements to begin evaluating predictive models on the dataset.

## Autocorrelation Analysis

Statistical correlation summarizes the strength of the relationship between two variables.

We can assume the distribution of each variable fits a Gaussian (bell curve) distribution. If this is the case, we can use the Pearson’s correlation coefficient to summarize the correlation between the variables.

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient is a number between -1 and 1 that describes a negative or positive correlation respectively. A value of zero indicates no correlation.

We can calculate the correlation for time series observations with observations with previous time steps, called lags. Because the correlation of the time series observations is calculated with values of the same series at previous times, this is called a serial correlation, or an autocorrelation.

A plot of the autocorrelation of a time series by lag is called the AutoCorrelation Function, or the acronym ACF. This plot is sometimes called a correlogram, or an autocorrelation plot.

A partial autocorrelation function or PACF is a summary of the relationship between an observation in a time series with observations at prior time steps with the relationships of intervening observations removed.

The autocorrelation for an observation and an observation at a prior time step is comprised of both the direct correlation and indirect correlations. These indirect correlations are a linear function of the correlation of the observation, with observations at intervening time steps.

It is these indirect correlations that the partial autocorrelation function seeks to remove. Without going into the math, this is the intuition for the partial autocorrelation.

We can calculate autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots using the plot_acf() and plot_pacf() statsmodels functions respectively.

In order to calculate and plot the autocorrelation, we must convert the data into a univariate time series. Specifically, the observed daily total power consumed.

The *to_series()* function below will take the multivariate data divided into weekly windows and will return a single univariate time series.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
# convert windows of weekly multivariate data into a series of total power def to_series(data): # extract just the total power from each week series = [week[:, 0] for week in data] # flatten into a single series series = array(series).flatten() return series |

We can call this function for the prepared training dataset.

First, the daily power consumption dataset must be loaded.

1 2 |
# load the new file dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption_days.csv', header=0, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates=['datetime'], index_col=['datetime']) |

The dataset must then be split into train and test sets with the standard week window structure.

1 2 |
# split into train and test train, test = split_dataset(dataset.values) |

A univariate time series of daily power consumption can then be extracted from the training dataset.

1 2 |
# convert training data into a series series = to_series(train) |

We can then create a single figure that contains both an ACF and a PACF plot. The number of lag time steps can be specified. We will fix this to be one year of daily observations, or 365 days.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
# plots pyplot.figure() lags = 365 # acf axis = pyplot.subplot(2, 1, 1) plot_acf(series, ax=axis, lags=lags) # pacf axis = pyplot.subplot(2, 1, 2) plot_pacf(series, ax=axis, lags=lags) # show plot pyplot.show() |

The complete example is listed below.

We would expect that the power consumed tomorrow and in the coming week will be dependent upon the power consumed in the prior days. As such, we would expect to see a strong autocorrelation signal in the ACF and PACF plots.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 |
# acf and pacf plots of total power from numpy import split from numpy import array from pandas import read_csv from matplotlib import pyplot from statsmodels.graphics.tsaplots import plot_acf from statsmodels.graphics.tsaplots import plot_pacf # split a univariate dataset into train/test sets def split_dataset(data): # split into standard weeks train, test = data[1:-328], data[-328:-6] # restructure into windows of weekly data train = array(split(train, len(train)/7)) test = array(split(test, len(test)/7)) return train, test # convert windows of weekly multivariate data into a series of total power def to_series(data): # extract just the total power from each week series = [week[:, 0] for week in data] # flatten into a single series series = array(series).flatten() return series # load the new file dataset = read_csv('household_power_consumption_days.csv', header=0, infer_datetime_format=True, parse_dates=['datetime'], index_col=['datetime']) # split into train and test train, test = split_dataset(dataset.values) # convert training data into a series series = to_series(train) # plots pyplot.figure() lags = 365 # acf axis = pyplot.subplot(2, 1, 1) plot_acf(series, ax=axis, lags=lags) # pacf axis = pyplot.subplot(2, 1, 2) plot_pacf(series, ax=axis, lags=lags) # show plot pyplot.show() |

Running the example creates a single figure with both ACF and PACF plots.

The plots are very dense, and hard to read. Nevertheless, we might be able to see a familiar autoregression pattern.

We might also see some significant lag observations at one year out. Further investigation may suggest a seasonal autocorrelation component, which would not be a surprising finding.

We can zoom in the plot and change the number of lag observations from 365 to 50.

1 |
lags = 50 |

Re-running the code example with this change results is a zoomed-in version of the plots with much less clutter.

We can clearly see a familiar autoregression pattern across the two plots. This pattern is comprised of two elements:

**ACF**: A large number of significant lag observations that slowly degrade as the lag increases.**PACF**: A few significant lag observations that abruptly drop as the lag increases.

The ACF plot indicates that there is a strong autocorrelation component, whereas the PACF plot indicates that this component is distinct for the first approximately seven lag observations.

This suggests that a good starting model would be an AR(7); that is an autoregression model with seven lag observations used as input.

## Develop an Autoregression Model

We can develop an autoregression model for univariate series of daily power consumption.

The Statsmodels library provides multiple ways of developing an AR model, such as using the AR, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMAX classes.

We will use the ARIMA implementation as it allows for easy expandability into differencing and moving average.

First, the history data comprised of weeks of prior observations must be converted into a univariate time series of daily power consumption. We can use the *to_series()* function developed in the previous section.

1 2 |
# convert history into a univariate series series = to_series(history) |

Next, an ARIMA model can be defined by passing arguments to the constructor of the ARIMA class.

We will specify an AR(7) model, which in ARIMA notation is ARIMA(7,0,0).

1 2 |
# define the model model = ARIMA(series, order=(7,0,0)) |

Next, the model can be fit on the training data. We will use the defaults and disable all debugging information during the fit by setting *disp=False*.

1 2 |
# fit the model model_fit = model.fit(disp=False) |

Now that the model has been fit, we can make a prediction.

A prediction can be made by calling the *predict()* function and passing it either an interval of dates or indices relative to the training data. We will use indices starting with the first time step beyond the training data and extending it six more days, giving a total of a seven day forecast period beyond the training dataset.

1 2 |
# make forecast yhat = model_fit.predict(len(series), len(series)+6) |

We can wrap all of this up into a function below named *arima_forecast()* that takes the history and returns a one week forecast.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
# arima forecast def arima_forecast(history): # convert history into a univariate series series = to_series(history) # define the model model = ARIMA(series, order=(7,0,0)) # fit the model model_fit = model.fit(disp=False) # make forecast yhat = model_fit.predict(len(series), len(series)+6) return yhat |

This function can be used directly in the test harness described previously.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 |
# arima forecast from math import sqrt from numpy import split from numpy import array from pandas import read_csv from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error from matplotlib import pyplot from statsmodels.tsa.arima_model import ARIMA # split a univariate dataset into train/test sets def split_dataset(data): # split into standard weeks train, test = data[1:-328], data[-328:-6] # restructure into windows of weekly data train = array(split(train, len(train)/7)) test = array(split(test, len(test)/7)) return train, test # evaluate one or more weekly forecasts against expected values def evaluate_forecasts(actual, predicted): scores = list() # calculate an RMSE score for each day for i in range(actual.shape[1]): # calculate mse mse = mean_squared_error(actual[:, i], predicted[:, i]) # calculate rmse rmse = sqrt(mse) # store scores.append(rmse) # calculate overall RMSE s = 0 for row in range(actual.shape[0]): for col in range(actual.shape[1]): s += (actual[row, col] - predicted[row, col])**2 score = sqrt(s / (actual.shape[0] * actual.shape[1])) return score, scores # summarize scores def summarize_scores(name, score, scores): s_scores = ', '.join(['%.1f' % s for s in scores]) print('%s: [%.3f] %s' % (name, score, s_scores)) # evaluate a single model def evaluate_model(model_func, train, test): # history is a list of weekly data history = [x for x in train] # walk-forward validation over each week predictions = list() for i in range(len(test)): # predict the week yhat_sequence = model_func(history) # store the predictions predictions.append(yhat_sequence) # get real observation and add to history for predicting the next week history.append(test[i, :]) predictions = array(predictions) # evaluate predictions days for each week score, scores = evaluate_forecasts(test[:, :, 0], predictions) return score, scores # convert windows of weekly multivariate data into a series of total power def to_series(data): # extract just the total power from each week series = [week[:, 0] for week in data] # flatten into a single series series = array(series).flatten() return series # arima forecast def arima_forecast(history): # convert history into a univariate series series = to_series(history) # define the model model = ARIMA(series, order=(7,0,0)) # fit the model model_fit = model.fit(disp=False) # make forecast yhat = model_fit.predict(len(series), len(series)+6) return yhat # load the new file # split into train and test train, test = split_dataset(dataset.values) # define the names and functions for the models we wish to evaluate models = dict() models['arima'] = arima_forecast # evaluate each model days = ['sun', 'mon', 'tue', 'wed', 'thr', 'fri', 'sat'] for name, func in models.items(): # evaluate and get scores score, scores = evaluate_model(func, train, test) # summarize scores summarize_scores(name, score, scores) # plot scores pyplot.plot(days, scores, marker='o', label=name) # show plot pyplot.legend() pyplot.show() |

Running the example first prints the performance of the AR(7) model on the test dataset.

We can see that the model achieves the overall RMSE of about 381 kilowatts.

This model has skill when compared to naive forecast models, such as a model that forecasts the week ahead using observations from the same time one year ago that achieved an overall RMSE of about 465 kilowatts.

1 |
arima: [381.636] 393.8, 398.9, 357.0, 377.2, 393.9, 306.1, 432.2 |

A line plot of the forecast is also created, showing the RMSE in kilowatts for each of the seven lead times of the forecast.

We can see an interesting pattern.

We might expect that earlier lead times are easier to forecast than later lead times, as the error at each successive lead time compounds.

Instead, we see that Friday (lead time +6) is the easiest to forecast and Saturday (lead time +7) is the most challenging to forecast. We can also see that the remaining lead times all have a similar error in the mid- to high-300 kilowatt range.

## Extensions

This section lists some ideas for extending the tutorial that you may wish to explore.

**Tune ARIMA**. The parameters of the ARIMA model were not tuned. Explore or search a suite of ARIMA parameters (q, d, p) to see if performance can be further improved.**Explore Seasonal AR**. Explore whether the performance of the AR model can be improved by including seasonal autoregression elements. This may require the use of a SARIMA model.**Explore Data Preparation**. The model was fit on the raw data directly. Explore whether standardization or normalization or even power transforms can further improve the skill of the AR model.

If you explore any of these extensions, I’d love to know.

## Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

### API

- pandas.read_csv API
- pandas.DataFrame.resample API
- Resample Offset Aliases
- sklearn.metrics.mean_squared_error API
- numpy.split API
- statsmodels.graphics.tsaplots.plot_acf API
- statsmodels.graphics.tsaplots.plot_pacf API
- statsmodels.tsa.arima_model.ARIMA API

### Articles

- Individual household electric power consumption Data Set, UCI Machine Learning Repository.
- AC power, Wikipedia.
- Correlogram, Wikipedia.

## Summary

In this tutorial, you discovered how to develop and evaluate an autoregression model for multi-step forecasting household power consumption.

Specifically, you learned:

- How to create and analyze autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation plots for univariate time series data.
- How to use the findings from autocorrelation plots to configure an autoregression model.
- How to develop and evaluate an autocorrelation model used to make one-week forecasts.

Do you have any questions?

Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Great article. Wonder how this compares with time series forecasting with Prophet?

Thank you

Thanks.

Perhaps develop a comparison?

Great read, thanks for this.

You’re welcome.

Great work, your truly gave this forecasting an insightful overview. Thanks

Thanks Alex.

the LSTM does not appear to be suitable for autoregression type problems.So this method is the best solution.But your posts have some LSTM and CNN models to solve this autoregression type problems

Somtimes a hybrid model can perform very well.

model = ARIMA(series, order=(7,0,0))

the“7” maens lag?I have test 8 and some day perform good score as setting 7.

The results are the same for each run,while the results of in-depth learning are different each time it runs.

Yes.

What do you mean “in depth learning”?

how to set Machine precision in ARIMA()?

I note that Machine precision is 2.220D-16 in model training,but sometimes it can not Convergence

Not sure you can, not want to. It is a limitation of the libs under statsmodels.

we evaluate model in every times,model will be fitted at same time?

In the for loop, the value of history is updated at a time.

Yes, this is called walk-forward validation.

Thanks,I fund that deep learning model is not updating in every times

What do you mean exactly?

Thank you for such useful information

I’m happy that it helped.

I only have a question, why don’t you add a graph showing comparison between the predicted values and the actual real one?

Thanks for the suggestion.

If you need help making plots of forecasts, perhaps start here:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/start-here/#timeseries