Clustering or cluster analysis is an unsupervised learning problem.

It is often used as a data analysis technique for discovering interesting patterns in data, such as groups of customers based on their behavior.

There are many clustering algorithms to choose from and no single best clustering algorithm for all cases. Instead, it is a good idea to explore a range of clustering algorithms and different configurations for each algorithm.

In this tutorial, you will discover how to fit and use top clustering algorithms in python.

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

- Clustering is an unsupervised problem of finding natural groups in the feature space of input data.
- There are many different clustering algorithms and no single best method for all datasets.
- How to implement, fit, and use top clustering algorithms in Python with the scikit-learn machine learning library.

Let’s get started.

## Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into three parts; they are:

- Clustering
- Clustering Algorithms
- Examples of Clustering Algorithms
- Library Installation
- Clustering Dataset
- Affinity Propagation
- Agglomerative Clustering
- BIRCH
- DBSCAN
- K-Means
- Mini-Batch K-Means
- Mean Shift
- OPTICS
- Spectral Clustering
- Gaussian Mixture Model

## Clustering

Cluster analysis, or clustering, is an unsupervised machine learning task.

It involves automatically discovering natural grouping in data. Unlike supervised learning (like predictive modeling), clustering algorithms only interpret the input data and find natural groups or clusters in feature space.

Clustering techniques apply when there is no class to be predicted but rather when the instances are to be divided into natural groups.

— Page 141, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2016.

A cluster is often an area of density in the feature space where examples from the domain (observations or rows of data) are closer to the cluster than other clusters. The cluster may have a center (the centroid) that is a sample or a point feature space and may have a boundary or extent.

These clusters presumably reflect some mechanism at work in the domain from which instances are drawn, a mechanism that causes some instances to bear a stronger resemblance to each other than they do to the remaining instances.

— Pages 141-142, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2016.

Clustering can be helpful as a data analysis activity in order to learn more about the problem domain, so-called pattern discovery or knowledge discovery.

For example:

- The phylogenetic tree could be considered the result of a manual clustering analysis.
- Separating normal data from outliers or anomalies may be considered a clustering problem.
- Separating clusters based on their natural behavior is a clustering problem, referred to as market segmentation.

Clustering can also be useful as a type of feature engineering, where existing and new examples can be mapped and labeled as belonging to one of the identified clusters in the data.

Evaluation of identified clusters is subjective and may require a domain expert, although many clustering-specific quantitative measures do exist. Typically, clustering algorithms are compared academically on synthetic datasets with pre-defined clusters, which an algorithm is expected to discover.

Clustering is an unsupervised learning technique, so it is hard to evaluate the quality of the output of any given method.

— Page 534, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, 2012.

## Clustering Algorithms

There are many types of clustering algorithms.

Many algorithms use similarity or distance measures between examples in the feature space in an effort to discover dense regions of observations. As such, it is often good practice to scale data prior to using clustering algorithms.

Central to all of the goals of cluster analysis is the notion of the degree of similarity (or dissimilarity) between the individual objects being clustered. A clustering method attempts to group the objects based on the definition of similarity supplied to it.

— Page 502, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2016.

Some clustering algorithms require you to specify or guess at the number of clusters to discover in the data, whereas others require the specification of some minimum distance between observations in which examples may be considered “*close*” or “*connected*.”

As such, cluster analysis is an iterative process where subjective evaluation of the identified clusters is fed back into changes to algorithm configuration until a desired or appropriate result is achieved.

The scikit-learn library provides a suite of different clustering algorithms to choose from.

A list of 10 of the more popular algorithms is as follows:

- Affinity Propagation
- Agglomerative Clustering
- BIRCH
- DBSCAN
- K-Means
- Mini-Batch K-Means
- Mean Shift
- OPTICS
- Spectral Clustering
- Mixture of Gaussians

Each algorithm offers a different approach to the challenge of discovering natural groups in data.

There is no best clustering algorithm, and no easy way to find the best algorithm for your data without using controlled experiments.

In this tutorial, we will review how to use each of these 10 popular clustering algorithms from the scikit-learn library.

The examples will provide the basis for you to copy-paste the examples and test the methods on your own data.

We will not dive into the theory behind how the algorithms work or compare them directly. For a good starting point on this topic, see:

Let’s dive in.

## Examples of Clustering Algorithms

In this section, we will review how to use 10 popular clustering algorithms in scikit-learn.

This includes an example of fitting the model and an example of visualizing the result.

The examples are designed for you to copy-paste into your own project and apply the methods to your own data.

### Library Installation

First, let’s install the library.

Don’t skip this step as you will need to ensure you have the latest version installed.

You can install the scikit-learn library using the pip Python installer, as follows:

1 |
sudo pip install scikit-learn |

For additional installation instructions specific to your platform, see:

Next, let’s confirm that the library is installed and you are using a modern version.

Run the following script to print the library version number.

1 2 3 |
# check scikit-learn version import sklearn print(sklearn.__version__) |

Running the example, you should see the following version number or higher.

1 |
0.22.1 |

### Clustering Dataset

We will use the make_classification() function to create a test binary classification dataset.

The dataset will have 1,000 examples, with two input features and one cluster per class. The clusters are visually obvious in two dimensions so that we can plot the data with a scatter plot and color the points in the plot by the assigned cluster. This will help to see, at least on the test problem, how “well” the clusters were identified.

The clusters in this test problem are based on a multivariate Gaussian, and not all clustering algorithms will be effective at identifying these types of clusters. As such, the results in this tutorial should not be used as the basis for comparing the methods generally.

An example of creating and summarizing the synthetic clustering dataset is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
# synthetic classification dataset from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset X, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=2, n_informative=2, n_redundant=0, n_clusters_per_class=1, random_state=4) # create scatter plot for samples from each class for class_value in range(2): # get row indexes for samples with this class row_ix = where(y == class_value) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

Running the example creates the synthetic clustering dataset, then creates a scatter plot of the input data with points colored by class label (idealized clusters).

We can clearly see two distinct groups of data in two dimensions and the hope would be that an automatic clustering algorithm can detect these groupings.

Next, we can start looking at examples of clustering algorithms applied to this dataset.

I have made some minimal attempts to tune each method to the dataset.

**Can you get a better result for one of the algorithms?**

Let me know in the comments below.

### Affinity Propagation

Affinity Propagation involves finding a set of exemplars that best summarize the data.

We devised a method called “affinity propagation,” which takes as input measures of similarity between pairs of data points. Real-valued messages are exchanged between data points until a high-quality set of exemplars and corresponding clusters gradually emerges

— Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points, 2007.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the AffinityPropagation class and the main configuration to tune is the “*damping*” set between 0.5 and 1, and perhaps “preference.”

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
# affinity propagation clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import AffinityPropagation from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset X, _ = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=2, n_informative=2, n_redundant=0, n_clusters_per_class=1, random_state=4) # define the model model = AffinityPropagation(damping=0.9) # fit the model model.fit(X) # assign a cluster to each example yhat = model.predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

Running the example fits the model on the training dataset and predicts a cluster for each example in the dataset. A scatter plot is then created with points colored by their assigned cluster.

In this case, I could not achieve a good result.

### Agglomerative Clustering

Agglomerative clustering involves merging examples until the desired number of clusters is achieved.

It is a part of a broader class of hierarchical clustering methods and you can learn more here:

It is implemented via the AgglomerativeClustering class and the main configuration to tune is the “*n_clusters*” set, an estimate of the number of clusters in the data, e.g. 2.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
# agglomerative clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import AgglomerativeClustering from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset X, _ = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=2, n_informative=2, n_redundant=0, n_clusters_per_class=1, random_state=4) # define the model model = AgglomerativeClustering(n_clusters=2) # fit model and predict clusters yhat = model.fit_predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

Running the example fits the model on the training dataset and predicts a cluster for each example in the dataset. A scatter plot is then created with points colored by their assigned cluster.

In this case, a reasonable grouping is found.

### BIRCH

BIRCH Clustering (BIRCH is short for Balanced Iterative Reducing and Clustering using

Hierarchies) involves constructing a tree structure from which cluster centroids are extracted.

BIRCH incrementally and dynamically clusters incoming multi-dimensional metric data points to try to produce the best quality clustering with the available resources (i. e., available memory and time constraints).

— BIRCH: An efficient data clustering method for large databases, 1996.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the Birch class and the main configuration to tune is the “*threshold*” and “*n_clusters*” hyperparameters, the latter of which provides an estimate of the number of clusters.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
# birch clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import Birch from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset X, _ = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=2, n_informative=2, n_redundant=0, n_clusters_per_class=1, random_state=4) # define the model model = Birch(threshold=0.01, n_clusters=2) # fit the model model.fit(X) # assign a cluster to each example yhat = model.predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

Running the example fits the model on the training dataset and predicts a cluster for each example in the dataset. A scatter plot is then created with points colored by their assigned cluster.

In this case, an excellent grouping is found.

## DBSCAN

DBSCAN Clustering (where DBSCAN is short for Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise) involves finding high-density areas in the domain and expanding those areas of the feature space around them as clusters.

… we present the new clustering algorithm DBSCAN relying on a density-based notion of clusters which is designed to discover clusters of arbitrary shape. DBSCAN requires only one input parameter and supports the user in determining an appropriate value for it

— A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise, 1996.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the DBSCAN class and the main configuration to tune is the “*eps*” and “*min_samples*” hyperparameters.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
# dbscan clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import DBSCAN from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = DBSCAN(eps=0.30, min_samples=9) # fit model and predict clusters yhat = model.fit_predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, a reasonable grouping is found, although more tuning is required.

### K-Means

K-Means Clustering may be the most widely known clustering algorithm and involves assigning examples to clusters in an effort to minimize the variance within each cluster.

The main purpose of this paper is to describe a process for partitioning an N-dimensional population into k sets on the basis of a sample. The process, which is called ‘k-means,’ appears to give partitions which are reasonably efficient in the sense of within-class variance.

— Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, 1967.

The technique is described here:

It is implemented via the KMeans class and the main configuration to tune is the “*n_clusters*” hyperparameter set to the estimated number of clusters in the data.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
# k-means clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import KMeans from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = KMeans(n_clusters=2) # fit the model model.fit(X) # assign a cluster to each example yhat = model.predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, a reasonable grouping is found, although the unequal equal variance in each dimension makes the method less suited to this dataset.

### Mini-Batch K-Means

Mini-Batch K-Means is a modified version of k-means that makes updates to the cluster centroids using mini-batches of samples rather than the entire dataset, which can make it faster for large datasets, and perhaps more robust to statistical noise.

… we propose the use of mini-batch optimization for k-means clustering. This reduces computation cost by orders of magnitude compared to the classic batch algorithm while yielding significantly better solutions than online stochastic gradient descent.

— Web-Scale K-Means Clustering, 2010.

The technique is described in the paper:

- Web-Scale K-Means Clustering, 2010.

It is implemented via the MiniBatchKMeans class and the main configuration to tune is the “*n_clusters*” hyperparameter set to the estimated number of clusters in the data.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
# mini-batch k-means clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import MiniBatchKMeans from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = MiniBatchKMeans(n_clusters=2) # fit the model model.fit(X) # assign a cluster to each example yhat = model.predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, a result equivalent to the standard k-means algorithm is found.

### Mean Shift

Mean shift clustering involves finding and adapting centroids based on the density of examples in the feature space.

We prove for discrete data the convergence of a recursive mean shift procedure to the nearest stationary point of the underlying density function and thus its utility in detecting the modes of the density.

— Mean Shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis, 2002.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the MeanShift class and the main configuration to tune is the “*bandwidth*” hyperparameter.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
# mean shift clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import MeanShift from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = MeanShift() # fit model and predict clusters yhat = model.fit_predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, a reasonable set of clusters are found in the data.

### OPTICS

OPTICS clustering (where OPTICS is short for Ordering Points To Identify the Clustering Structure) is a modified version of DBSCAN described above.

We introduce a new algorithm for the purpose of cluster analysis which does not produce a clustering of a data set explicitly; but instead creates an augmented ordering of the database representing its density-based clustering structure. This cluster-ordering contains information which is equivalent to the density-based clusterings corresponding to a broad range of parameter settings.

— OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure, 1999.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the OPTICS class and the main configuration to tune is the “*eps*” and “*min_samples*” hyperparameters.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
# optics clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import OPTICS from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = OPTICS(eps=0.8, min_samples=10) # fit model and predict clusters yhat = model.fit_predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, I could not achieve a reasonable result on this dataset.

### Spectral Clustering

Spectral Clustering is a general class of clustering methods, drawn from linear algebra.

A promising alternative that has recently emerged in a number of fields is to use spectral methods for clustering. Here, one uses the top eigenvectors of a matrix derived from the distance between points.

— On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm, 2002.

The technique is described in the paper:

It is implemented via the SpectralClustering class and the main Spectral Clustering is a general class of clustering methods, drawn from linear algebra. to tune is the “*n_clusters*” hyperparameter used to specify the estimated number of clusters in the data.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 |
# spectral clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.cluster import SpectralClustering from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = SpectralClustering(n_clusters=2) # fit model and predict clusters yhat = model.fit_predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, reasonable clusters were found.

### Gaussian Mixture Model

A Gaussian mixture model summarizes a multivariate probability density function with a mixture of Gaussian probability distributions as its name suggests.

For more on the model, see:

It is implemented via the GaussianMixture class and the main configuration to tune is the “*n_clusters*” hyperparameter used to specify the estimated number of clusters in the data.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |
# gaussian mixture clustering from numpy import unique from numpy import where from sklearn.datasets import make_classification from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture from matplotlib import pyplot # define dataset # define the model model = GaussianMixture(n_components=2) # fit the model model.fit(X) # assign a cluster to each example yhat = model.predict(X) # retrieve unique clusters clusters = unique(yhat) # create scatter plot for samples from each cluster for cluster in clusters: # get row indexes for samples with this cluster row_ix = where(yhat == cluster) # create scatter of these samples pyplot.scatter(X[row_ix, 0], X[row_ix, 1]) # show the plot pyplot.show() |

In this case, we can see that the clusters were identified perfectly. This is not surprising given that the dataset was generated as a mixture of Gaussians.

## Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

### Papers

- Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points, 2007.
- BIRCH: An efficient data clustering method for large databases, 1996.
- A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise, 1996.
- Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, 1967.
- Web-Scale K-Means Clustering, 2010.
- Mean Shift: A robust approach toward feature space analysis, 2002.
- On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm, 2002.

### Books

- Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2016.
- The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2016.
- Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, 2012.

### APIs

### Articles

- Cluster analysis, Wikipedia.
- Hierarchical clustering, Wikipedia.
- k-means clustering, Wikipedia.
- Mixture model, Wikipedia.

## Summary

In this tutorial, you discovered how to fit and use top clustering algorithms in python.

Specifically, you learned:

- Clustering is an unsupervised problem of finding natural groups in the feature space of input data.
- There are many different clustering algorithms, and no single best method for all datasets.
- How to implement, fit, and use top clustering algorithms in Python with the scikit-learn machine learning library.

Do you have any questions?

Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Thanks as always!

You’re welcome Richard!

Thank you for this illustrative post Jason.

You’re very welcome Paul!

Good post

Thanks!

Dear Jason,

Thank you for the quick and clear introduction to clustering.

I was wantering if there is a way to chose a clustering algorithm rather than another when approaching a clustering problem.

I would say that is a matter of the problem. And maybe dataset visualization helps to decide which algorithm to pick. However, I was thinking if there are some suggestions to keep in mind when choosing the algorithm.

in addition:

1- How can we visualize high dimensional data in order to understand if there is a behind structure? (I am thinking to reduce dimesionality with PCA to 2D/3D, and then draw the original axis in this new representation, but is anyway quite hard).

2- How can we chose the algorithm for different dataset size (from very small to very big)?

Kind Regards,

Marco

You’re welcome.

Often a performance metric that is meaningful to your project is used and optimized:

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/classes.html#clustering-metrics

1- How can we visualize high dimensional data in order to understand if there is a behind structure? (I am thinking to reduce dimesionality with PCA to 2D/3D, and then draw the original axis in this new representation, but is anyway quite hard).

Ans: Please try seaborn python package to visualize high dimensional data (upto 7). this package is very efficient. Of course, you may reduce dimensions and try seaborn together.

2- How can we chose the algorithm for different dataset size (from very small to very big)?

Ans: the bigger is the better 🙂 However, you may need a domain expert to evaluate the results. Because, although you can think that one result is perfect visually (as discussed above), it is not always the best. Lets take the visual result of OPTICS (see above). Maybe some cancer tissues are hidden inside a big part?

Yes, see the manifold learning methods:

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/manifold.html

Typically the complexity of the algorithm will play a part, e.g. choose faster algorithms for large dataset or work with a sample of the data instead of all of it.

Thank you to both for the kind answers. I really appreaciate that.

Regarding the answers:

1- I tryied using seaborn in different ways to visualize high dimensional data. I found pair plot useful for understanding the every feature distribution as well as the distribution over every couple of features. Do you have any other suggestions?

Mainfold approach is something I still haven’t used yet, since I do not know so well the theory behind it (maybe a suggestion for the next post ;)). However, I will try both with t-SNE, and the quite new UMAP.

2- Thank you for the hint. The problem I am working on is on a complete unsupervised dataset. The idea was to drive some evaluations, starting from the results of the clustering. Means that every clustering algorithm could be used for the first clustering approach. The expert working with me were not completely able to provide some additional informations on the structure of the data (even if the final decision will be binary, the items we are analizing can have different feature structure – reason why I was clustering with > 2 clusters). At the end, I decided to apply a GMM, select a bounch of items for each cluster, and ask for an evaluation on those. Once this evaluation will be ready, I will try to evaluate the clusters based on this limited amount of labels, trying to optimize both the algorithm and the hyperparameters.

Really thank you for you support

I like pca, sammons mapping, som, tsne and a few others.

Good luck!

Just saw this blog post and one of your old replies came to my mind:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/supervised-and-unsupervised-machine-learning-algorithms/#comment-409461

Thank you as always.

Great!

How to apply the code to my data instead of the make_classification dataset. What changes do I need to do to define my x, y and what changes in the for loop. I have three columns (two variables x,y in the first two columns and one variable in the third column (Z) that I want to color the x,y values with Z values)

Load the data from a CSV file:

http://machinelearningmastery.com/load-machine-learning-data-python/

thank you very much.

i applied for my data

https://www.kaggle.com/abdulmeral/10-models-for-clustering

Well done!

Illustrious and informative post

Thanks!

Well demonstrated. Thank you

Thanks!

Jason, this was a very well illustrated post on clustering algos.

I was wondering if you could uncover the math behind each of these algos. That would be great to understand their internals.

Thanks.

Yes, see the referenced papers for each method.

Have you ever considered Latent Class Analysis (LCA). I know its been there for long, but not very popular. Thanks!

No, what is it?

I saw it referenced as the state of the art in customer segmentation in marketing analytics (mike grigsby) but there’s no scitkit implementation

Thanks for sharing.

Latent Class Analysis (LCA) is a model for clustering categorical

data.

Thanks for letting me know Jose, not sure I am familiar with it off the cuff.

Thanks.

You’re welcome.

Thanks again for a wonderful post Jason.

Just a quick question. If we want to find similar behaving consumer products, for example, in skin care. There are over 200 SKUs and we want to find products based on their sales, discounts paid out, channels, regions, etc , how would we go about applying these clustering algorithms? Can they be applied?. Because visualizing clusters would be challenging and secondly, how to set up the task with multiple attributes out of which some are categorical?

Evaluating clusters is very hard – it makes me dislike the whole topic because it becomes subjective.

You can use metrics:

https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/classes.html#clustering-metrics

Or use a subject matter expert to review the clusters.

You should check out HDBScan: https://hdbscan.readthedocs.io/en/latest/how_hdbscan_works.html

Thanks for sharing!

Hi Jason.

I have a dataset containing 50000 vectors with 512 dimensions. what is the best and the fastest method to cluster them?

Thank you for your interesting post.

Each method has a different tradeoff. Perhaps compare a few methods directly.

Thank you for this, so thorough, and I plan to study closely! At the moment tho, I am looking for information on the best approach to use for a data set that includes about 2k observations and 30 binary (0/1) features, and want to solve for the best fitting number of clusters. Grateful for any tips!

Perhaps try a suite of methods and see which produces clusters you think match your expectations.

Most clustering algorithms require specifying “n_clusters” parameter or some threshold equivalent. While working with 2D/3D data, it is easy to visually supervise this parameter, but in more dimensions it may be problematic. Do you know how to approach this if we don’t have a clue how many clusters are to be expected?

Regards!

No, sorry. This is subjective nature of the methods makes me deeply dislike using clustering in practice.

hi sir ,

i am trying to find sequence clustering of hmm’s with different time scales .

i am trying to implementing this paper -https://papers.nips.cc/paper/1217-clustering-sequences-with-hidden-markov-models.pdf

i have doubt in 2.1 section ,plz help me how should i proceed??

Sorry, I cannot help you with this. Perhaps try posting on cross-validated.

Thanks for such an lucid article over clustering…

You’re welcome!

You have discussed little amount of unsupervised methods like clustering.

No, I tend to focus on supervised learning.

can u please help me with vertex based clustering(based on jaccard simillarity)..

Thanks for the suggestion, perhaps I will write about it in the future.

Hey,

I need help with what X I should use as input in kmeans.fit(). I want to generate a 3D plot of K-Means clusters using the first three principal components because the original feature space is high-dimensional (n features = 34!). This is my plot:

https://github.com/tuttoaposto/OpenSource/blob/master/Derm_Clustering/Derm_3D_KMeans.png

The code below shows how I normalized and mapped X to the PCs. Which clustering results, y_kmeans or y_kmeans_pca should I use? X_pca is not 0-1 bound. Or should I normalize X_pca first and use kmeans.fit_predict(X_pca_normlized) instead?

Code:

X_normalized = MinMaxScaler().fit_transform(X)

pca = PCA(n_components=3).fit(X_normalized)

X_pca = pca.transform(X_normalized)

kmeans = KMeans(n_clusters=6, random_state=0)

# assign a cluster to each example

y_kmeans_pca= kmeans.fit_predict(X_pca)

# assign a cluster to each example

y_kmeans= kmeans.predict(X_normalized)

Thank you!

Sorry, I cannot help you create a 3d plot, I don’t have a tutorial on this topic.

My question is not about creating a 3d plot. My question is, if I want to visualize clustering of high-dimension data, what X input should I apply to kmeans.fit(): 1) normalized X values, principal components, or normalized principal components since some PCs have range -1 to 1, some have range -2 to 2. Thanks!

Regardless of the number of dimensions of your data, you would use k-means in generally the same way, e.g. call model.fit() and pass all input data.

Yes, it is a good idea to scale input data first, e.g. normalize or standardize the inputs.

hello sir,

i want to make new algorithm for clustering to overcome disadvantage of all algorithm can you guide?

i want to make new algorithm for efficient and robust clustering.

This sounds like a research project, I recommend talking to your research advisor about it.