fbpx

How to Calculate Feature Importance With Python

Last Updated on August 20, 2020

Feature importance refers to techniques that assign a score to input features based on how useful they are at predicting a target variable.

There are many types and sources of feature importance scores, although popular examples include statistical correlation scores, coefficients calculated as part of linear models, decision trees, and permutation importance scores.

Feature importance scores play an important role in a predictive modeling project, including providing insight into the data, insight into the model, and the basis for dimensionality reduction and feature selection that can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of a predictive model on the problem.

In this tutorial, you will discover feature importance scores for machine learning in python

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

  • The role of feature importance in a predictive modeling problem.
  • How to calculate and review feature importance from linear models and decision trees.
  • How to calculate and review permutation feature importance scores.

Kick-start your project with my new book Data Preparation for Machine Learning, including step-by-step tutorials and the Python source code files for all examples.

Let’s get started.

  • Update May/2020: Added example of feature selection using importance.
How to Calculate Feature Importance With Python

How to Calculate Feature Importance With Python
Photo by Bonnie Moreland, some rights reserved.

Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into six parts; they are:

  1. Feature Importance
  2. Preparation
    1. Check Scikit-Learn Version
    2. Test Datasets
  3. Coefficients as Feature Importance
    1. Linear Regression Feature Importance
    2. Logistic Regression Feature Importance
  4. Decision Tree Feature Importance
    1. CART Feature Importance
    2. Random Forest Feature Importance
    3. XGBoost Feature Importance
  5. Permutation Feature Importance
    1. Permutation Feature Importance for Regression
    2. Permutation Feature Importance for Classification
  6. Feature Selection with Importance

Feature Importance

Feature importance refers to a class of techniques for assigning scores to input features to a predictive model that indicates the relative importance of each feature when making a prediction.

Feature importance scores can be calculated for problems that involve predicting a numerical value, called regression, and those problems that involve predicting a class label, called classification.

The scores are useful and can be used in a range of situations in a predictive modeling problem, such as:

  • Better understanding the data.
  • Better understanding a model.
  • Reducing the number of input features.

Feature importance scores can provide insight into the dataset. The relative scores can highlight which features may be most relevant to the target, and the converse, which features are the least relevant. This may be interpreted by a domain expert and could be used as the basis for gathering more or different data.

Feature importance scores can provide insight into the model. Most importance scores are calculated by a predictive model that has been fit on the dataset. Inspecting the importance score provides insight into that specific model and which features are the most important and least important to the model when making a prediction. This is a type of model interpretation that can be performed for those models that support it.

Feature importance can be used to improve a predictive model. This can be achieved by using the importance scores to select those features to delete (lowest scores) or those features to keep (highest scores). This is a type of feature selection and can simplify the problem that is being modeled, speed up the modeling process (deleting features is called dimensionality reduction), and in some cases, improve the performance of the model.

Often, we desire to quantify the strength of the relationship between the predictors and the outcome. […] Ranking predictors in this manner can be very useful when sifting through large amounts of data.

— Page 463, Applied Predictive Modeling, 2013.

Feature importance scores can be fed to a wrapper model, such as the SelectFromModel class, to perform feature selection.

There are many ways to calculate feature importance scores and many models that can be used for this purpose.

Perhaps the simplest way is to calculate simple coefficient statistics between each feature and the target variable. For more on this approach, see the tutorial:

In this tutorial, we will look at three main types of more advanced feature importance; they are:

  • Feature importance from model coefficients.
  • Feature importance from decision trees.
  • Feature importance from permutation testing.

Let’s take a closer look at each.

Want to Get Started With Data Preparation?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

Download Your FREE Mini-Course

Preparation

Before we dive in, let’s confirm our environment and prepare some test datasets.

Check Scikit-Learn Version

First, confirm that you have a modern version of the scikit-learn library installed.

This is important because some of the models we will explore in this tutorial require a modern version of the library.

You can check the version of the library you have installed with the following code example:

Running the example will print the version of the library. At the time of writing, this is about version 0.22.

You need to be using this version of scikit-learn or higher.

Test Datasets

Next, let’s define some test datasets that we can use as the basis for demonstrating and exploring feature importance scores.

Each test problem has five important and five unimportant features, and it may be interesting to see which methods are consistent at finding or differentiating the features based on their importance.

Classification Dataset

We will use the make_classification() function to create a test binary classification dataset.

The dataset will have 1,000 examples, with 10 input features, five of which will be informative and the remaining five will be redundant. We will fix the random number seed to ensure we get the same examples each time the code is run.

An example of creating and summarizing the dataset is listed below.

Running the example creates the dataset and confirms the expected number of samples and features.

Regression Dataset

We will use the make_regression() function to create a test regression dataset.

Like the classification dataset, the regression dataset will have 1,000 examples, with 10 input features, five of which will be informative and the remaining five that will be redundant.

Running the example creates the dataset and confirms the expected number of samples and features.

Next, let’s take a closer look at coefficients as importance scores.

Coefficients as Feature Importance

Linear machine learning algorithms fit a model where the prediction is the weighted sum of the input values.

Examples include linear regression, logistic regression, and extensions that add regularization, such as ridge regression and the elastic net.

All of these algorithms find a set of coefficients to use in the weighted sum in order to make a prediction. These coefficients can be used directly as a crude type of feature importance score.

Let’s take a closer look at using coefficients as feature importance for classification and regression. We will fit a model on the dataset to find the coefficients, then summarize the importance scores for each input feature and finally create a bar chart to get an idea of the relative importance of the features.

Linear Regression Feature Importance

We can fit a LinearRegression model on the regression dataset and retrieve the coeff_ property that contains the coefficients found for each input variable.

These coefficients can provide the basis for a crude feature importance score. This assumes that the input variables have the same scale or have been scaled prior to fitting a model.

The complete example of linear regression coefficients for feature importance is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The scores suggest that the model found the five important features and marked all other features with a zero coefficient, essentially removing them from the model.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of Linear Regression Coefficients as Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of Linear Regression Coefficients as Feature Importance Scores

This approach may also be used with Ridge and ElasticNet models.

Logistic Regression Feature Importance

We can fit a LogisticRegression model on the regression dataset and retrieve the coeff_ property that contains the coefficients found for each input variable.

These coefficients can provide the basis for a crude feature importance score. This assumes that the input variables have the same scale or have been scaled prior to fitting a model.

The complete example of logistic regression coefficients for feature importance is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

Recall this is a classification problem with classes 0 and 1. Notice that the coefficients are both positive and negative. The positive scores indicate a feature that predicts class 1, whereas the negative scores indicate a feature that predicts class 0.

No clear pattern of important and unimportant features can be identified from these results, at least from what I can tell.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of Logistic Regression Coefficients as Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of Logistic Regression Coefficients as Feature Importance Scores

Now that we have seen the use of coefficients as importance scores, let’s look at the more common example of decision-tree-based importance scores.

Decision Tree Feature Importance

Decision tree algorithms like classification and regression trees (CART) offer importance scores based on the reduction in the criterion used to select split points, like Gini or entropy.

This same approach can be used for ensembles of decision trees, such as the random forest and stochastic gradient boosting algorithms.

Let’s take a look at a worked example of each.

CART Feature Importance

We can use the CART algorithm for feature importance implemented in scikit-learn as the DecisionTreeRegressor and DecisionTreeClassifier classes.

After being fit, the model provides a feature_importances_ property that can be accessed to retrieve the relative importance scores for each input feature.

Let’s take a look at an example of this for regression and classification.

CART Regression Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting a DecisionTreeRegressor and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of DecisionTreeRegressor Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of DecisionTreeRegressor Feature Importance Scores

CART Classification Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting a DecisionTreeClassifier and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps four of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of DecisionTreeClassifier Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of DecisionTreeClassifier Feature Importance Scores

Random Forest Feature Importance

We can use the Random Forest algorithm for feature importance implemented in scikit-learn as the RandomForestRegressor and RandomForestClassifier classes.

After being fit, the model provides a feature_importances_ property that can be accessed to retrieve the relative importance scores for each input feature.

This approach can also be used with the bagging and extra trees algorithms.

Let’s take a look at an example of this for regression and classification.

Random Forest Regression Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting a RandomForestRegressor and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps two or three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of RandomForestRegressor Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of RandomForestRegressor Feature Importance Scores

Random Forest Classification Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting a RandomForestClassifier and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps two or three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of RandomForestClassifier Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of RandomForestClassifier Feature Importance Scores

XGBoost Feature Importance

XGBoost is a library that provides an efficient and effective implementation of the stochastic gradient boosting algorithm.

This algorithm can be used with scikit-learn via the XGBRegressor and XGBClassifier classes.

After being fit, the model provides a feature_importances_ property that can be accessed to retrieve the relative importance scores for each input feature.

This algorithm is also provided via scikit-learn via the GradientBoostingClassifier and GradientBoostingRegressor classes and the same approach to feature selection can be used.

First, install the XGBoost library, such as with pip:

Then confirm that the library was installed correctly and works by checking the version number.

Running the example, you should see the following version number or higher.

For more on the XGBoost library, start here:

Let’s take a look at an example of XGBoost for feature importance on regression and classification problems.

XGBoost Regression Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting a XGBRegressor and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps two or three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of XGBRegressor Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of XGBRegressor Feature Importance Scores

XGBoost Classification Feature Importance

The complete example of fitting an XGBClassifier and summarizing the calculated feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps seven of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of XGBClassifier Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of XGBClassifier Feature Importance Scores

Permutation Feature Importance

Permutation feature importance is a technique for calculating relative importance scores that is independent of the model used.

First, a model is fit on the dataset, such as a model that does not support native feature importance scores. Then the model is used to make predictions on a dataset, although the values of a feature (column) in the dataset are scrambled. This is repeated for each feature in the dataset. Then this whole process is repeated 3, 5, 10 or more times. The result is a mean importance score for each input feature (and distribution of scores given the repeats).

This approach can be used for regression or classification and requires that a performance metric be chosen as the basis of the importance score, such as the mean squared error for regression and accuracy for classification.

Permutation feature selection can be used via the permutation_importance() function that takes a fit model, a dataset (train or test dataset is fine), and a scoring function.

Let’s take a look at this approach to feature selection with an algorithm that does not support feature selection natively, specifically k-nearest neighbors.

Permutation Feature Importance for Regression

The complete example of fitting a KNeighborsRegressor and summarizing the calculated permutation feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps two or three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of KNeighborsRegressor With Permutation Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of KNeighborsRegressor With Permutation Feature Importance Scores

Permutation Feature Importance for Classification

The complete example of fitting a KNeighborsClassifier and summarizing the calculated permutation feature importance scores is listed below.

Running the example fits the model, then reports the coefficient value for each feature.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

The results suggest perhaps two or three of the 10 features as being important to prediction.

A bar chart is then created for the feature importance scores.

Bar Chart of KNeighborsClassifier With Permutation Feature Importance Scores

Bar Chart of KNeighborsClassifier With Permutation Feature Importance Scores

Feature Selection with Importance

Feature importance scores can be used to help interpret the data, but they can also be used directly to help rank and select features that are most useful to a predictive model.

We can demonstrate this with a small example.

Recall, our synthetic dataset has 1,000 examples each with 10 input variables, five of which are redundant and five of which are important to the outcome. We can use feature importance scores to help select the five variables that are relevant and only use them as inputs to a predictive model.

First, we can split the training dataset into train and test sets and train a model on the training dataset, make predictions on the test set and evaluate the result using classification accuracy. We will use a logistic regression model as the predictive model.

This provides a baseline for comparison when we remove some features using feature importance scores.

The complete example of evaluating a logistic regression model using all features as input on our synthetic dataset is listed below.

Running the example first the logistic regression model on the training dataset and evaluates it on the test set.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case we can see that the model achieved the classification accuracy of about 84.55 percent using all features in the dataset.

Given that we created the dataset, we would expect better or the same results with half the number of input variables.

We could use any of the feature importance scores explored above, but in this case we will use the feature importance scores provided by random forest.

We can use the SelectFromModel class to define both the model we wish to calculate importance scores, RandomForestClassifier in this case, and the number of features to select, 5 in this case.

We can fit the feature selection method on the training dataset.

This will calculate the importance scores that can be used to rank all input features. We can then apply the method as a transform to select a subset of 5 most important features from the dataset. This transform will be applied to the training dataset and the test set.

Tying this all together, the complete example of using random forest feature importance for feature selection is listed below.

Running the example first performs feature selection on the dataset, then fits and evaluates the logistic regression model as before.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case, we can see that the model achieves the same performance on the dataset, although with half the number of input features. As expected, the feature importance scores calculated by random forest allowed us to accurately rank the input features and delete those that were not relevant to the target variable.

Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

Related Tutorials

Books

APIs

Summary

In this tutorial, you discovered feature importance scores for machine learning in python

Specifically, you learned:

  • The role of feature importance in a predictive modeling problem.
  • How to calculate and review feature importance from linear models and decision trees.
  • How to calculate and review permutation feature importance scores.

Do you have any questions?
Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Get a Handle on Modern Data Preparation!

Data Preparation for Machine Learning

Prepare Your Machine Learning Data in Minutes

...with just a few lines of python code

Discover how in my new Ebook:
Data Preparation for Machine Learning

It provides self-study tutorials with full working code on:
Feature Selection, RFE, Data Cleaning, Data Transforms, Scaling, Dimensionality Reduction, and much more...

Bring Modern Data Preparation Techniques to
Your Machine Learning Projects


See What's Inside

185 Responses to How to Calculate Feature Importance With Python

  1. Martin March 30, 2020 at 6:35 pm #

    This tutorial lacks the most important thing – comparison between feature importance and permutation importance. Which to choose and why?

    For interested: https://explained.ai/rf-importance/

    Best method to compare feature importance in Generalized Linear Models (Linear Regression, Logistic Regression etc.) is multiplying feature coefficients with standard devation of variable. It gives you standarized betas, which aren’t affected by variable’s scale measure. Thanks to that, they are comparable.

    Scaling or standarizing variables works only if you have ONLY numeric data, which in practice… never happens.

    • Jason Brownlee March 31, 2020 at 7:59 am #

      Comparison requires a context, e.g. a specific dataset that you’re intersted in solving and suite of models.

      • Ankit February 8, 2021 at 9:36 am #

        Hey Jason
        If i have a numerical dataset with around 40 independent variables and one dependent variable called quality. I want to find the features which cause a drop in quality or which feature affect the dependent variables the most.
        However there is multicolleanirity present in the independent variables so i need to first group all the independent variables as per internal collinearity and then find the ones which affect quality the most.

        • Jason Brownlee February 8, 2021 at 12:55 pm #

          Feature importance will give a per-variable idea of the influence on each independent variable on the dependent variable, taking into account interaction supported by the model.

    • Luigi December 31, 2020 at 12:32 am #

      Hi Martin,

      if you have already scaled your numerical dataset with StandardScaler, do you still have to rank the feature by multiplying coefficient by std or since it was already scaled coefficnet rank is enough?

      Thanks
      Luigi

    • Parsa July 6, 2021 at 1:37 am #

      Hi Martin,
      Can you elaborate on that? Coefficient in which method? Assuming one has a neural network for classification with a large number of features I don’t think any of the weights be meaningful on their own.

  2. Oliver Tomic March 30, 2020 at 7:54 pm #

    Hi Jason!

    Thanks for the nice coding examples and explanation. A little comment though, regarding the Random Forest feature importances: would it be worth mentioning that the feature importance using

    importance = model.feature_importances_

    could potentially provide importances that are biased toward continuous features and high-cardinality categorical features?

    best wishes
    Oliver

    • Jason Brownlee March 31, 2020 at 8:06 am #

      It may be, what makes you say that?

      • Oliver Tomic March 31, 2020 at 5:48 pm #

        I came across this post a couple of years ago when it got published which discusses how you have to be careful interpreting feature importances from Random Forrest in general. This was exemplified using scikit learn and some other package in R.

        https://explained.ai/rf-importance/index.html

        This is the same that Martin mentioned above.

        best wishes
        Oliver

  3. Aventinus March 30, 2020 at 11:22 pm #

    Thank you, Jason, that was very informative.

    As a newbie in data science I a question:

    Is the concept of Feature Importance applicable to all methods? What about DL methods (CNNs, LSTMs)? What about BERT? I’m thinking that, intuitively, a similar function should be available no matter then method used, but when searching online I find that the answer is not clear. I guess I lack some basic, key knowledge here.

    • Jason Brownlee March 31, 2020 at 8:12 am #

      Yes, but different methods are used.

      Here, we are focused on tabular data.

  4. Alex March 31, 2020 at 1:04 am #

    Hi, I am a freshman and I am wondering that with the development of deep learning that could find feature automatically, are the feature engineering that help construct feature manually and efficently going to be out of date? If not, where can we use feature engineering better than deep learning?

    • Jason Brownlee March 31, 2020 at 8:13 am #

      It performs feature extraction automatically.

      Even so, such models may or may not perform better than other methods.

  5. Fotis April 1, 2020 at 7:28 am #

    Hi, I am freshman too. I would like to ask if there is any way to implement “Permutation Feature Importance for Classification” using deep NN with Keras?

    • Jason Brownlee April 1, 2020 at 8:10 am #

      I don’t see why not. Use the Keras wrapper class for your model.

  6. Ruud Goorden April 3, 2020 at 6:10 am #

    Hi. Just a little addition to your review. Beware of feature importance in RFs using standard feature importance metrics. See: https://explained.ai/rf-importance/
    Keep up the good work!

  7. Bill April 3, 2020 at 7:10 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Any plans please to post some practical stuff on Knowledge Graph (Embedding)?

    Thanks,Bill

  8. Ricardo April 5, 2020 at 10:31 pm #

    Your tutorials are so interesting.

  9. Van-Hau Nguyen April 6, 2020 at 1:57 pm #

    Hi Jason,

    thank you very much for your post. It is very interesting as always!
    May I conclude that each method ( Linear, Logistic, Random Forest, XGBoost, etc.) can lead to its own way to Calculate Feature Importance?

    Thank you.

    • Jason Brownlee April 7, 2020 at 5:36 am #

      Thanks.

      Yes, we can get many different views on what is important.

  10. Mayank April 11, 2020 at 9:01 pm #

    Hey Jason!!

    Does this method works for the data having both categorical and continuous features? or we have to separate those features and then compute feature importance which i think wold not be good practice!.

    and off topic question, can we apply P.C.A to categorical features if not then is there any equivalent method for categorical feature?

    • Jason Brownlee April 12, 2020 at 6:20 am #

      I believe so.

      No. PCA is for numeric data.

      • Mayank April 12, 2020 at 1:56 pm #

        And L.D.A is for categorical values??

        • Jason Brownlee April 13, 2020 at 6:09 am #

          LDA – linear discriminant analysis – no it’s for numerical values too.

  11. Dina April 13, 2020 at 1:04 pm #

    Hi Jason, I learnt a lot from your website about machine learning. By the way, do you have an idea on how to know feature importance that use keras model?

  12. Sam April 18, 2020 at 3:05 am #

    Hi Jason,

    I’m a Data Analytics grad student from Colorado and your website has been a great resource for my learning!

    I have a question about the order in which one would do feature selection in the machine learning process. My dataset is heavily imbalanced (95%/5%) and has many NaN’s that require imputation. A professor also recommended doing PCA along with feature selection. Where would you recommend placing feature selection? My initial plan was imputation -> feature selection -> SMOTE -> scaling -> PCA.

    For some more context, the data is 1.8 million rows by 65 columns. The target variable is binary and the columns are mostly numeric with some categorical being one hot encoded.

    Appreciate any wisdom you can pass along!

    • Jason Brownlee April 18, 2020 at 6:09 am #

      Thanks, I’m happy to hear that.

      Experiment to discover what works best.

      I would do PCA or feature selection, not both. I would probably scale, sample then select. But also try scale, select, and sample.

      • Zhou Jie July 9, 2021 at 5:41 pm #

        Hi, Jason

        Thanks for your post !

        I got one question about the feature importance scores in the case of imbalanced class dataset. Does the class imbalance affect the interpretation of feature importance, in other words, if a binary classifier(say, random forest) is fitted on a heavily skewed dataset, is the feature imporatnce scores got form the model still credible? Thank you~

        • Jason Brownlee July 10, 2021 at 6:10 am #

          It may, depending on the method used. Very likely.

          Perhaps test a suite of methods and compare the results of the model fit on the selected features.

  13. Mbonu Chinedu April 25, 2020 at 7:09 am #

    Thanks Jason for this information.

  14. Deeksha April 29, 2020 at 11:17 pm #

    Hi Jason,

    I am running Decision tree regressor to identify the most important predictor. The output I got is in the same format as given. However I am not being able to understand what is meant by “Feature 1” and what is the significance of the number given.

    I ran the Random forest regressor as well but not being able to compare the result due to unavailability of labelS. Please do provide the Python code to map appropriate fields and Plot.

    Thanks

    • Jason Brownlee April 30, 2020 at 6:44 am #

      If you have a list of string names for each column, then the feature index will be the same as the column name index.

      Does that help?

      • chris January 27, 2021 at 4:42 am #

        Hi Jason 🙂 thanks fot this very helpful example!
        i have a very similar question: i do not have a list of string names, but rather use scaler and onehot encoder in my model via pipeline. Do you have any tipp how i can find out which feature number belongs to which feature name after using onehot enc and also having numerical variables in my model?:-/
        Thank you so much in advance!

  15. Swapnil Bendale May 3, 2020 at 3:47 pm #

    Sir,

    How about using SelectKbest from sklearn to identify the best features???
    How does it differ in calculations from the above method?

    Thankin advance

    • Jason Brownlee May 3, 2020 at 5:10 pm #

      Yes, it allows you to use feature importance as a feature selection method.

  16. Alex May 8, 2020 at 7:36 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Great post an nice coding examples. I am quite new to the field of machine learning. I was playing with my own dataset and fitted a simple decision tree (classifier 0,1). Model accuracy was 0.65. I was very surprised when checking the feature importance. They were all 0.0 (7 features of which 6 are numerical. How is that even possible?

    Best
    Alex

    • Jason Brownlee May 8, 2020 at 8:02 am #

      Thanks.

      65% is low, near random. Perhaps the feature importance does not provide insight on your dataset. It is not absolute importance, more of a suggestion.

  17. Alex May 8, 2020 at 9:02 am #

    ok thanks, and yes it‘s really almost random. But still, I would have expected even some very small numbers around 0.01 or so because all features being exactly 0.0 … anyway, will check and use your great blog and comments for further education . thanks

  18. Grzegorz Kępisty May 22, 2020 at 11:06 pm #

    I can see that many readers link the article “Beware Default Random Forest Importances” that compare default RF Gini importances in sklearn and permutation importance approach. I believe that is worth mentioning the other trending approach called SHAP:
    https://www.kaggle.com/wrosinski/shap-feature-importance-with-feature-engineering
    https://towardsdatascience.com/explain-your-model-with-the-shap-values-bc36aac4de3d
    Recently I use it as one of a few parallel methods for feature selection. It seems to be worth our attention, because it uses independent method to calculate importance (in comparison to Gini or permutation methods). Also it is helpful for visualizing how variables influence model output. Do you have any experience or remarks on it?
    Regards!

  19. Montse May 31, 2020 at 6:37 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Thanks so much for these useful posts as well as books!
    Would you mind sharing your thoughts about the differences between getting feature importance of our XGBoost model by retrieving the coeffs or directly with the built-in plot function?

    • Jason Brownlee May 31, 2020 at 8:51 am #

      Both provide the same importance scores I believe. What do you mean exactly?

      • Montse June 1, 2020 at 7:31 am #

        I am currently using feature importance scores to rank the inputs of the dataset I am working on. I obtained different scores (and a different importance order) depending on if retrieving the coeffs via model.feature_importances_ or with the built-in plot function plot_importance(model). The specific model used is XGBRegressor(learning_rate=0.01,n_estimators=100, subsample=0.5, max_depth=7 )

        So that, I was wondering if each of them use different strategies to interpret the relative importance of the features on the model …and what would be the best approach to decide which one of them select and when.

        Thanks again Jason, for all your great work.

        • Jason Brownlee June 1, 2020 at 1:37 pm #

          It is possible that different metrics are being used in the plot.

          I believe I have seen this before, look at the arguments to the function used to create the plot.

  20. kejingrio June 2, 2020 at 12:00 pm #

    Hi Jason, Thanks it is very useful.
    I have some difficult on Permutation Feature Importance for Regression.I feel puzzled at the
    scoring “MSE”. “MSE” is closer to 0, the more well-performant the model.When
    according to the “Outline of the permutation importance algorithm”, importance is the difference between original “MSE”and new “MSE”.That is to say, the larger the difference, the less important the original feature is. But the meaning of the article is that the greater the difference, the more important the feature is

  21. Alex June 19, 2020 at 10:59 am #

    Hello all,

    Other than model performance metrics (MSE, classification error, etc), is there any way to visualize the importance of the ranked variables from these algorithms?

    For example, do you expect to see a separation in the data (if any exists) when the important variables are plotted vs index (trend chart), or in a 2D scatter plot array?

    Do the top variables always show the most separation (if there is any in the data) when plotted vs index or 2D? or do you have to usually search through the list to see something when drilldown? if you have to search down then what does the ranking even mean when drilldown isnt consistent down the list?

    What if you have an “important” variable but see nothing in a trend plot or 2D scatter plot of features? If nothing is seen then no action can be taken to fix the problem, so are they really “important”?

    If a variable is important in High D, and contributes to accuracy, will it always show something in trend or 2D Plot ? if not how to convince anyone it is important?

    I think variable importances are very difficult to interpret, especially if you are fitting high dimensional models.

    I hope to hear some interesting thoughts.

    Thanks a lot!
    Alex
    SeasonWarez

    • Jason Brownlee June 19, 2020 at 1:12 pm #

      Yes, the bar charts used in this tutorial is a way to visualize feature importance.

      Perhaps I don’t understand your question?

      • Alex June 25, 2020 at 12:11 am #

        The bar charts are not the actual data itself. For these High D models with importances, do you expect to see anything in the actual data on a trend chart or 2D plots of F1vsF2 etc…

        If you cant see it in the actual data, How do you make a decision or take action on these important variables?

        • Alex June 25, 2020 at 12:13 am #

          like if you color the data by Good/Bad Group1/Group2 in classification. or if you do a correalation between X and Y in regression.

          If you use such high D models, would the probability of seeing nothing in the drilldown of the data increase? If you see nothing in the data drilldown, how do you take action? Is there really something there in High D that is meaningful ?

          This is the issues I see with these automatic ranking methods using models.

          • Jason Brownlee June 25, 2020 at 6:22 am #

            They can be useful, e.g. fit a model on each perspective or each subset of features, compare results and go with the features that result in the best performing master. Faster than an exhaustive search of subsets, especially when n features is very large.

        • Jason Brownlee June 25, 2020 at 6:21 am #

          Each algorithm is going to have a different perspective on what is important. Personally, I use any feature importance outcomes as suggestions, perhaps during modeling or perhaps during a summary of the problem.

          • Alex June 26, 2020 at 4:04 am #

            I dont think I am communicating clearly lol.

            You are focusing on getting the best model in terms of accuracy (MSE etc). Yes feature selection is definitely useful for that task, Genetic Algo is another one that can come in handy too for that.

            However in terms of interpreting an outlier, or fault in the data using the model. Or when doing Classification like Random Forest for determining what is different between GroupA/GroupB. And ranking the variables.
            During interpretation of the input variable data (what I call Drilldown), I would plot Feature1 vs Index (or time) called univariate trend. Or Feature1 vs Feature2 in a scatter plot.

            Now if you have a High D model with many inputs, you will get a ranking. But even if you look at the individual input trends, or individual correlations, or F2vsF2 scatterplots, you can still see nothing at all. The good/bad data wont stand out visually or statistically in lower dimensions.
            The correlations will be low, and the bad data wont stand out in the important variables.

            This problem gets worse with higher and higher D, more and more inputs to the models.

            So my question is if you have such a model that has good accuracy, and many many inputs. When you see an outlier or excursion in the data how do you visualize what happened in the input space if you see nothing in lower D plots? If the problem is truly a 4D or higher problem, how do you visualize it and take action on it?

            Thanks a lot

          • Jason Brownlee June 26, 2020 at 5:39 am #

            Thanks for elaborating Alex.

            One approach is to use manifold learning and project the feature space to a lower dimensional space that preserves the salient properties/structure.

            Perhaps start with a tsne:
            https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/manifold.html

  22. Anthony The Koala June 26, 2020 at 7:34 am #

    Dear Dr Jason,
    Thank you for this tutorial.
    This is my understanding of the line – adopting the use with iris data.

    First we look at the inner function:

    In essence we generate a ‘skeleton’ of decision tree classifiers. There are 10 decision trees. Note this is a skeleton.

    For the next example I will use the iris data from:

    model =
    We can fit a model to the decision tree classifier:

    You may ask why fit a model to a bunch of decision trees?
    In the above example we are fitting a model with ALL the features.

    Then you may ask, what about this: by putting a RandomForestClassifier into a SelectFromModel

    In this case we get our model ‘model’ from SelectFromModel. In the iris data there are five features in the data set. Here the above function SelectFromModel selects the ‘best’ model with at most 3 features.

    We get a model from the SelectFromModel instead of the RandomForestClassifier. So we don’t fit the model on RandomForestClassifier, but rather RandomForestClassifier feeds the ‘skeleton’ of decision tree classfiers. Then the model is determined by selecting a model by based on the best three features.

    Thank you
    Anthony of Sydney

    • Jason Brownlee June 26, 2020 at 10:24 am #

      The “SelectFromModel” is not a model, you cannot make predictions with it.

      Instead it is a transform that will select features using some other model as a guide, like a RF.

      • Anthony The Koala June 26, 2020 at 8:09 pm #

        Dear Dr Jason,
        Thank you
        Anthony of Sydney

        • Jason Brownlee June 27, 2020 at 5:29 am #

          You’re welcome.

        • Anthony The Koala June 28, 2020 at 4:27 am #

          Dear Dr Jason,
          Need clarification here on “SelectFromModel” please.
          Referring to the last set of code lines 12-14 in this blog

          What do we do when “fs” is fitted in

          Is “fs.fit” fitting a model?
          Thank you,
          Anthony of Sydney

  23. Anthony The Koala June 28, 2020 at 5:21 am #

    -Here is an example using iris data.
    Iris data has four features, and one output which is a categorial 0,1,2

    In sum, there is a difference between the model.fit and the fs.fit.

    Question is what is fs.fit please?

    Thank you,
    Anthony of Sydney

      • Anthony The Koala June 28, 2020 at 8:05 am #

        Dear Dr Jason,
        I looked at the definition of fit( as:

        I don’t feel wiser from the meaning.
        Why couldn’t the developers say that the fit(X) method gets the best fit columns of X?
        This is because when you print the model, you get the subset of the features X.

        To me the words “transform” mean do some mathematical operation .
        But in this context, “transform” means obtain the features which explained the most to predict y.

        Thank you,
        Anthony of Sydney

        • Anthony The Koala June 29, 2020 at 12:05 am #

          Dear Dr Jason,
          To tie things up we would like to know the names of the features that were determined by the SelectFromModel

          Hope that helps,
          Anthony of Sydney

          • Anthony The Koala June 29, 2020 at 1:13 am #

            Dear Dr Jason,
            I apologize for the “alternative” version to obtain names using ‘zip’ function. IGNORE THE LAST ENTRY as the results are incorrect.
            Apologies
            Anthony of Sydney

          • Anthony The Koala June 29, 2020 at 1:24 am #

            Rather the alternative is

            This is the correct alternative using the ‘zip’ function.
            Apologies again.

            Anthony of Sydney

        • Jason Brownlee June 29, 2020 at 6:23 am #

          It is mathematical.

          In this case, transform refers to the fact that Xprime = f(X), where Xprime is a subset of columns of X.

          • Anthony The Koala June 29, 2020 at 7:14 am #

            Thank you,
            Anthony of Sydney

          • Jason Brownlee June 29, 2020 at 1:18 pm #

            You’re welcome.

  24. Anthony The Koala June 30, 2020 at 3:54 am #

    Dear Dr Jason,
    Thanks again for your tutorial.

    I have experimented with for example RFE and GradientBoosterClassifier and determining a set of features to use, I found from experimenting with the iris_data that GradientBoosterClassifier will ‘determine’ that 2 features best explain the model to predict a species, while RFE ‘determines’ that 3 features best explain the model to predict a species.

    The question:
    Experimenting with GradientBoostClassifier determined 2 features while RFE determined 3 features.
    Must the results of feature selection be the same?
    Or in other words, is fine tuning the parameters for GradientBoostClassifier and RFE need to be adjusted – what parameters in the GradientBoostClassifier and RFE to be adjusted to get the same result.

    Thank you,
    Anthony of Sydney

    • Jason Brownlee June 30, 2020 at 6:30 am #

      Great question.

      No, each method will have a different idea on what features are important.

      • Anthony The Koala June 30, 2020 at 6:39 am #

        Thank you,
        Anthony of Sydney

  25. Manoj June 30, 2020 at 3:01 pm #

    Thank you Jason for sharing valuable content.
    Can you please clarify how classification accuracy effect if one of the input features is same as class attribute

    • Jason Brownlee July 1, 2020 at 5:48 am #

      You’re welcome!

      If the class label is used as input to the model, then the model should achieve perfect skill, In fact, the model is not required.

  26. CX July 12, 2020 at 1:53 am #

    Hello! Thanks for this great article!!
    I’m fairly new in ML and I got two questions related to feature importance calculation.

    First, for some reason, when using coef_, after having fitted a linear regression model, I get negative values for some of the features, is this normal? And if yes what could it mean about those features? Perhaps that (since we talk about linear regression) the smaller the value of the first feature the greater the value of the second feature (or the target value depending on which variables we are comparing). For the logistic regression it’s quite straight forward that a feature is correlated to one class or the other, but in linear regression negative values are quite confussing, could you please share your thoughts on that.

    Second, maybe not 100% on this topic but still I think worth mentioning. The scenario is the following. When trying the feature_importance_ of a DecisionTreeRegressor as the example above, the only difference that I use one of my own datasets. When I try the same script multiple times for the exact same configuration, if the dataset was splitted using train_test_split with a parameter of random_state equals a specific integer I get a different result each time I run the script. The only way to get the same results is to set random_state equals to false(not even None which is the default). From the docs of sklearn, I understand that using an int random_state results in a “reproducible output across multiple function calls” and trully this gives the same split every time, however when it comes to getting the feature_importance_ of the DecisionTreeRegressor model the results deffer every time? How and why is this possible?

    • Jason Brownlee July 12, 2020 at 5:55 am #

      You’re welcome.

      Yes, to be expected. If used as an importance score, make all values positive first.

      You may have to set the seed on the model as well.

      • CX July 12, 2020 at 11:40 pm #

        Thank you for the fast reply!
        For the first question, I made sure that all of the feature values are positive by using the feature_range=(0,1) parameter during normalization with MinMaxScaler, but unfortunatelly I am still getting negative coefficients.
        For the second question you were absolutely right, once I included a specific random_state for the DecisionTreeRegressor I got the same results after repetition.

        • Jason Brownlee July 13, 2020 at 6:03 am #

          Sorry, I mean that you can make the coefficients themselves positive before interpreting them as importance scores.

  27. Samuel July 16, 2020 at 3:23 pm #

    Hey Dr Jason. Do any of these methods work for time series? If I convert my time series to a supervised learning problem as you did in your previous tutorials, can I still do feature importance with Random Forest? I don’t know what the X and y will be.

  28. Arul July 23, 2020 at 5:24 pm #

    Hi Jason Brownlee,

    Thanks for the post.

    How can u say that important feature in certain scenarios.

    1) Random forest for feature importance on a classification problem (two or three while bar graph very near with other features)
    2) xgboost for feature importance on a classification problem (seven of the 10 features as being important to prediction.) Is there any threshold between 0.5 & 1.0
    3) permutation feature importance with knn for classification two or three while bar graph very near with other features)

    Thanks,
    Arul

    • Jason Brownlee July 24, 2020 at 6:24 am #

      Sorry, I don’t understand your question, perhaps you can restate or rephrase it?

  29. atra July 28, 2020 at 8:24 pm #

    Dear Dr Jason,
    Thanks for your tutorial.
    I am using feature importance scores to rank the variables of the dataset.
    I got the feature importance scores with random forest and decision tree.
    I did your step-by-step tutorial for classification models
    With model feature importance.
    This tutorial shows the importance scores in 1 runs. But I want the feature importance score in 100 runs.
    must abundant variables in100 first order position of the runing of DF & RF &svm model???
    thank you.

  30. atra July 29, 2020 at 6:39 pm #

    I have 200 records and 18 attributes.
    And my goal is to rank features.
    To validate the ranking model, I want an average of 100 runs.
    Do you have another method?
    I want help in this regard please.

    Can you also teach us Partial Dependence Plots in python?
    thank you

    • Jason Brownlee July 30, 2020 at 6:20 am #

      I don’ follow. How would ranked features be evaluated exactly?

      Thanks for the suggestion.

  31. atra July 30, 2020 at 10:06 pm #

    Can’t feature importance score in the above tutorial be used to rank the variables?
    If so, is that enough???!!

    • Jason Brownlee July 31, 2020 at 6:19 am #

      A single run will give a single rank. Multiple runs will give a mess.

  32. Tony August 6, 2020 at 6:53 am #

    Hi Jason, thanks for the awesome tutorial. I have a question when using Keras wrapper for a CNN model. CNN requires input in 3-dimension, but Scikit-learn only takes 2-dimension input for fit function. How do I satisfy dimension requirement of both 2D and 3D for Keras and Scikit-learn? Part of my code is shown below, thanks!

    from keras.wrappers.scikit_learn import KerasRegressor
    from sklearn.inspection import permutation_importance
    from matplotlib import pyplot
    # my input X is in shape of (10000*380*1) with 380 input features

    # define the model
    from tensorflow.keras.models import Sequential
    from tensorflow.keras import layers
    def base_model():
    model = Sequential()
    model.add(layers.Conv1D(40,7, activation=’relu’, input_shape=(input_dim,1))) #CONV1D require 3D input
    model.add(layers.MaxPooling1D(4))
    model.add(layers.Conv1D(60,11, activation=’relu’))
    model.add(layers.MaxPooling1D(8))
    model.add(layers.Dense(80, activation=’relu’))
    model.add(layers.Flatten())
    model.add(layers.Dense(2, activation=’linear’))

    model.compile(loss=’mse’,
    optimizer=’adam’,
    metrics=[‘mae’])

    print(model.summary())

    return model

    wrapper_model = KerasRegressor(build_fn=base_model)
    # fit the model
    wrapper_model.fit(X, Y) #scikit learn only take 2D input here
    # perform permutation importance
    results = permutation_importance(wrapper_model, X, Y, scoring=’neg_mean_squared_error’)
    # get importance
    importance = results.importances_mean

  33. Diego August 6, 2020 at 7:25 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Thanks for the article 🙂

    How can you get the feature importance if the model is part of an sklearn pipeline?

    Thanks

    • Jason Brownlee August 6, 2020 at 7:56 am #

      You can use the feature importance model standalone to calculate importances for your review.

  34. Jay August 16, 2020 at 8:41 am #

    This article is very informative, do we have real world examples instead of using n_samples=1000, n_features=10, ?????????

    • Jason Brownlee August 17, 2020 at 5:42 am #

      Thanks.

      I used the synthetic dataset intentionally so that you can focus on learning the method, then easily swap in your own dataset.

  35. Alex September 14, 2020 at 12:47 pm #

    Hi,

    I guess these methods for discovering the feature importance are valid when target variable is binary.
    Can we use suggested methods for a multi-class classification task?
    Thank you
    Alex

    • Jason Brownlee September 14, 2020 at 2:45 pm #

      Yes.

      • Alex September 16, 2020 at 3:07 am #

        In a binary task ( for example based on linear SVM coefficients), features with positive and negative coefficients have positive and negative associations, respectively, with probability of classification as a case.

        How about a multi-class classification task? How we can interpret the linear SVM coefficients?
        Thank you,

        • Jason Brownlee September 16, 2020 at 6:29 am #

          SVM does not support multi-class. Instead the problem must be transformed into multiple binary problems.

  36. Masoud October 23, 2020 at 10:11 am #

    Dear Jason,

    Thank you for your useful article.
    I was wondering if it is reasonable to implement a regression problem with Deep Neural Network and then get the importance scores of the predictor variables using the Random Forest feature importance?

    Thanks in advance,
    Masoud

    • Jason Brownlee October 23, 2020 at 1:39 pm #

      No. I don’t think the importance scores and the neural net model would be related in any useful way.

      • Masoud December 12, 2020 at 9:29 am #

        Dear Jason,

        Thank you for your reply. So I think the best way to retrieve the feature importance of parameters in the DNN or Deep CNN model (for a regression problem) is the Permutation Feature Importance. Am I right?

        Thanks in advance,
        Masoud

  37. Agnes Chintia Dewi October 23, 2020 at 5:09 pm #

    Hi Jason.

    I’m using AdaBoost Classifier to get the feature importance. I have 17 variables but the result only shows 16. What did I do wrong? Thanks

    • Jason Brownlee October 24, 2020 at 6:55 am #

      Perhaps you have 16 inputs and 1 output to equal 17.

  38. david November 21, 2020 at 3:55 am #

    Sorry if my question sounds dumb, but why are the feature importance results that much different between regression and classification although when using the same model like RandomForest for both ? I understand the target feature is the different, since it’s a numeric value when using the regression method or a categorical value (or class) when using the classification method. But the input features, aren’t they the same ? If not, it would have been interesting to use the same input feature dataset for regressions and classifications, so we could see the similarities and differences. Thanks.

  39. A.saber November 27, 2020 at 6:22 pm #

    Hi Jason and, Thanks for a great article

    Is there a way to set a minimum threshold in which we can say that it is from there it is important for the selection of features such as the average of the coefficients, quatile1 …..

    Thank you in advance

    cordially
    Saber

    • Jason Brownlee November 28, 2020 at 6:36 am #

      You’re welcome.

      Not really, model skill is the key focus, the features that result in best model performance should be selected.

  40. JG December 4, 2020 at 4:24 am #

    Nice tutorials Jason. Thank you !

    I see a big variety of techniques in order to reduce features dimensions or evaluate importance or select features from.a given dataset… most of them related to “sklearn” Library. I have followed them through several of your numerous tutorials about the topic…providing a rich space of methodologies to explore features relevance for our particular problem …sometime, a little bit confused because of the big amount of tools to be tested and evaluated…

    I have a single question to put it. Do we have something similar (or equivalent) to Images field (computer vision) or all of them are exclusively related to tabular dataset

    Thank you in advance

    • Jason Brownlee December 4, 2020 at 6:45 am #

      You’re welcome.

      Yes, pixel scaling and data augmentation is the main data prep methods for images.

  41. Zineb December 5, 2020 at 12:55 am #

    Thanks Jason for this informative tutorial.

    I’ve got 2 questions:

    1- You mentioned that “The positive scores indicate a feature that predicts class 1, whereas the negative scores indicate a feature that predicts class 0.”, that is mean that features related to positive scores aren’t used when predicting class 0?

    2- Since various techniques on the same dataset may produce different subsets of important features, shall we train the model using each subset and then keep the subset that makes the model perform the best? can we combine important features from different techniques?

  42. Bahar December 9, 2020 at 12:41 am #

    Hi Jason and thanks for this useful tutorial.
    I was wondering if we can use Lasso()
    model = BaggingRegressor(Lasso()) where you use
    # fit the model
    model = LogisticRegression(solver=’liblinear’)

    Because Lasso() itself does feature selection?

    Thanks in advance

    • Jason Brownlee December 9, 2020 at 6:26 am #

      Perhaps try it. Not sure using lasso inside a bagging model is wise.

      • Bahar December 14, 2020 at 8:40 pm #

        As Lasso() has feature selection, can I use it in your above code instead of “LogisticRegression(solver=’liblinear’)”:
        model = LogisticRegression(solver=’liblinear’)
        model = Lasso()

        And could you please let me know why it is not wise to use
        model = BaggingRegressor(Lasso())?

        When I adapt your code using model = BaggingRegressor(Lasso()) then I have the best result in comparison with other models.

        Thanks in advance

        • Jason Brownlee December 15, 2020 at 6:19 am #

          LASSO has feature selection, but not feature importance.

          Bagging is appropriate for high variance models, LASSO is not a high variance model.

          Nice work. Use the model that gives the best result on your problem.

  43. Alex Sun December 9, 2020 at 3:18 pm #

    Thank you very much for the interesting tutorial.
    May you help me out, please?

    I would like to rank my input features. Using the same input features, I ran the different models and got the results of feature coefficients. However, the rank of each feature coefficient was different among various models (e.g., RF and Logistic Regression). If I do not care about the result of the models, instead of the rank of the coefficients. Which model is the best? How we can evaluate the confidence of the feature coefficient rank?

    Thank you very much in advance.
    Best regards,
    Alex.

  44. Bahar December 14, 2020 at 11:48 pm #

    Dear Json,

    I have 40 features and using SelectFromModel I found that my model has better result with features [6, 9, 20,25].

    1-Can I just use these features and ignore other features and then predict? I did this way and the result was really bad.

    2-Can I use SelectFromModel to save my model? Could you please help me by providing information for making a pipeline to load new data and the model that is save using SelectFromModel and do the final prediction?

  45. Bahar December 15, 2020 at 12:23 am #

    MY other question is if I can use PCA and StandardScaler() before SelectFromModel?

    # split into train and test sets
    X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.33, random_state=1)

    #### here first StandardScaler on X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test
    #### then PCA on X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test

    # feature selection
    X_train_fs, X_test_fs, fs = select_features(X_trainSCPCA, y_trainSCPCA, X_testSCPCA)

    Thanks in advance

    • Jason Brownlee December 15, 2020 at 6:26 am #

      I would recommend using a Pipeline to perform a sequence of data transforms:
      https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.pipeline.Pipeline.html

      • Bahar December 17, 2020 at 4:49 am #

        Thanks I will use a pipeline but we still need a correct order in the pipeline, yes? That is why I asked about this order:

        1 – # split into train and test sets
        X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.33, random_state=1)

        2 – #### here first StandardScaler on X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test
        3 – #### then PCA on X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test

        4 – # feature selection
        X_train_fs, X_test_fs, fs = select_features(X_trainSCPCA, y_trainSCPCA, X_testSCPCA)

        Thanks in advance

        • Jason Brownlee December 17, 2020 at 6:39 am #

          Yes order is key.

          Standardizing prior to a PCA is the correct order.

  46. Luigi December 30, 2020 at 10:01 pm #

    Hi Jason,
    thanks for this great post.

    I have a question regarding permutation importance.

    Since it involves the permutation of each predictor, can it be applied to time data (my feature are daily financial indeces)?

    I am not sure if you can in this case, as you have some temporal order and serial correlation.
    What is your opinion about it?

    Many thanks
    Luigi

    • Jason Brownlee December 31, 2020 at 5:27 am #

      Maybe. I don’t know for sure, but off the cuff I think feature selection methods for tabular data may not be appropriate for time series data as a general rule.

  47. JG January 12, 2021 at 4:57 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Great Tutorial. Thank you.

    I have seen some criticism on this tutorial comments.
    So first of all, I like and support your teaching method that emphasizes more the use of the tool, that you provide with your piece of code vs big ideas/concept. I mean I rather prefer to have a “knife” and experiment how to cut wit it than big guys explaining big ideas on how to make cuts …but without providing me the tool.

    so I share here my experiments:

    1º) I experimented with Sklearn “permutation_importance” methods that seems the more objetive and also I apply it to my own regression dataset problem). I apply also scaling (MinMaxScaler()) to my dataset.
    So I decided to abandon a little bit the other ones equivalent methods such as: (RFE, KBest, and own methods for .coef_, .features_ mean, importances.mean for certain sklearn models

    2º) I apply “permutation_importance to several models (Some kind of Grid of comparative methods) with LinearRegressor(), SVR(), RandomForestRegressor(), ExtraTreesRegressor(), KNeighborsRegressor(), XGBRegressor() …and also I ad a simple ANN MLP model (not included
    on Sklearn)…

    3º) I decided to train all these models, and I decided to choose the best permutation_importance , in order to reduce the full features to a K-features only, but applied to the model where I got the best metric (e.g. RMSE) performance. Do you share my criterium?

    4º) finally I reduce the dataset according these best models (ANN, XGR, ETR, RFR) features importances values and check out the final performance of a new training, applied for reduced dataset features, …and I got even better performance than using the full dataset features …
    so I conclude that features importance selection was working correctly…
    even I got surprised because I select the features with a method but I got the best features reduction training performance with a close method but not the best.

    My questions are:
    5º) Could you write down the structure (or linked me to one of your tutorials) on how to save a sklearn trained model (weights) using Sklearn method (I hear using pickle but i do not specifically how)…
    6º) and of course how to load the Sklearn saved model weights …
    it is clear on Keras the equivalent ones: model.save(‘filename.h5) and,
    load_model(‘filename.h5’)

    regards,
    JG

  48. JG January 12, 2021 at 9:35 pm #

    Thank you Jason.

    You really provide a great added ML value !

  49. AtApi February 11, 2021 at 6:10 am #

    Thank you Jason for all your help! This website is a fantastic resource! Any post you make is an invaluable treat!!

  50. Reini February 19, 2021 at 4:08 am #

    Dear Jason,
    first of all, great work you are doing, thanks so much. If I want to cross-validate this model,
    is it correct to plug the RandomForest together with StandardScaler() and a linear model such as SVC() in a pipeline and to cross-validate it?

    Here would be the code:
    from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
    fs = SelectFromModel(RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=1000), max_features=30)

    model=SVC()
    model_=make_pipeline(StandardScaler(),fs,model)
    scores = cross_val_score(model_, X, y, cv=20)
    np.round(np.mean(scores),2)

    • Jason Brownlee February 19, 2021 at 6:04 am #

      You can use feature importance as one step in a pipeline.

      • Reini February 19, 2021 at 11:06 pm #

        Dear Jason,
        thank you so much for your fast reply- I don’t understand, I didn’t mean feature importance but if the cross-validation is legit if I plug the SelectFromModel RandomForest in a pipeline.. but I guess it is (?)

        • Jason Brownlee February 20, 2021 at 6:50 am #

          Yes, you can use that approach.

        • Data Science Enthusiast April 21, 2021 at 6:00 am #

          Hi Jason. This tutorial is exactly what I needed and I’m using Random Forest to find feature importance. My objective is not to make any predictions but just to see which variables are important to explain my dependent variable. So keeping this objective in mind, am I supposed to split my data in training and testing sets or in this case splitting is not required? This is an urgent question and would highly appreciate if you could reply fast

          • Jason Brownlee April 22, 2021 at 5:34 am #

            Perhaps just use all data to estimate the feature importance. E.g. it sounds like an analysis task rather than a prediction task.

  51. Huibin Fu February 23, 2021 at 8:17 pm #

    Hi bro, how to select the PermutationImportance feature by applying RFRegressor

  52. Amr Mahmoud March 9, 2021 at 11:23 pm #

    Hi Jason

    In your article above, the Logistic Regression Feature Importance gave coefficients that are positive and negative. I myself don’t like using sklearn and prefer to use statsmodels for regression and LR as I am able to obtain meaningful information (such as t stats and p values). When doing the regression with statsmodels, I got the same coefficients as you. But what is interesting is that statsmodels added a warning:

    ConvergenceWarning: Maximum Likelihood optimization failed to converge.

    Even when choosing other optimization methods, the results were the same (unable to converge) with all t-stats and p-values NaN

  53. Mojtaba March 14, 2021 at 5:26 am #

    Hi dear Jason
    How can I see the ranking of selected features in the SelectFromModel?

  54. Silmi April 14, 2021 at 1:28 am #

    I still confuse about feature importance sir. Could you help me ? if I use DecisionTreeClassifier() and then i use importance = model.feature_importances. So, Could I say that the output of the importance variable which is the score is the gini index value? Another case How can I find out the Gini index score as the feature selection of a model?

    • Jason Brownlee April 14, 2021 at 6:27 am #

      You would not use the importance in the tree, you could use it for some other purpose, such as explaining to project stakeholders how important each input is to the predictive model.

  55. Sarker April 28, 2021 at 11:41 pm #

    Hi Jason,

    I have physiological data where 120 data points recorded per sec. I used feature importance score and found that timestamp has more importance score than other features, even though timestamp has no correlation with other features. Why timestamp has more important score than other features? Any idea?

    Thanks

    • Jason Brownlee April 29, 2021 at 6:28 am #

      It may suggest an autocorrelation, e.g. try an ACF/PACF plot for the variable being predicted.

  56. Sarker April 29, 2021 at 8:51 am #

    Thanks for your prompt response. I will take a look at ACF/PACF but predicting score was around 90% for test data.

    I also looked at correlation matrix where other features are correlated with each other but timestamp is poorly correlated with other features. But the same dataset provides the more important score for the timestamp. Therefore, I’m confused that I did something wrong or not. How can I verify the important score of timestamp and other features are correct?

    • Jason Brownlee April 30, 2021 at 5:59 am #

      The score is just a guide, it is neither correct nor not incorrect.

      Instead, evaluate a model with and without a given feature to see if it helps in making predictions.

      • Sarker May 1, 2021 at 2:30 am #

        Thanks, Jason.

        I tried with and without timestamp features where without timestamp prediction score was only 66% and 90% with that features. So, I assume it’s an important feature to predict.
        However, the timestamp is poorly correlated with other features but the importance score of timestamp is 0.35 whereas other features score was from 0.05 to 0.16. What do you think about it?

        • Jason Brownlee May 1, 2021 at 6:08 am #

          I think feature importance for time series data is very different from tabular data and instead, you should be using pacf/acf plots.

          I think time series models and data prep must be evaluated using walk-forward validation to avoid data leakage.

          I think you should use whatever works best on a robust test harness.

  57. Silmi May 6, 2021 at 7:19 am #

    So how could i know the gini index in a model ? I need your suggestion

    • Jason Brownlee May 7, 2021 at 6:23 am #

      Sorry, I don’t have an example of calculating this metric for a model.

  58. Hamza Naeem May 18, 2021 at 3:44 pm #

    As we see above , That there are the multiple classifiers for calculating the feature importance , So how to choose that which method is best either Random Forest or Logistic regression or etc ?

  59. Srikanth May 22, 2021 at 9:31 pm #

    Should I first find the best hyperparameters (min_depth,min_samples_leaf, etc.) and then find the feature importances?
    Also, when do you recommend dropping the features using their importance values?

    • Jason Brownlee May 23, 2021 at 5:25 am #

      Good question. I generally avoid tuning models before calculating feature importance.

      Removing features is a step before modeling, e.g. data preparation.

  60. B June 6, 2021 at 8:22 pm #

    Hello,
    Any example about how to get node importance when having a graph database (neo4j)?
    Thanks

  61. JG June 27, 2021 at 3:18 am #

    Hi Jason,

    Could you clarify if the values obtained by permutacion_importance() function (or the other), related to features coefficients are any absolute meaning or normalized meaning? I do not see it …or by the contrary must be interpreted only as relative or ranking (coefficient) values?

    regards
    JG

    • Jason Brownlee June 27, 2021 at 4:40 am #

      I believe the scores are relative, not absolute.

      E.g. relative to each other for a specific run + dataset + model.

  62. MD ASHIQUR RAHMAN June 28, 2021 at 5:02 am #

    Hi Jason,

    What are the different algorithm used for determining feature importance like e.g., random forest regressor?
    I mean whether KNN can able to determine the feature importance?

    • Jason Brownlee June 28, 2021 at 8:00 am #

      I don’t think knn can determine feature importance.

      • MD ASHIQUR RAHMAN June 28, 2021 at 9:52 am #

        Thanhttps://machinelearningmastery.com/calculate-feature-importance-with-python/#respondks

  63. Mahsa July 1, 2021 at 7:45 am #

    Hi Jason,
    I have used Random Forest on my data and get 4 most important features. When I use whole data, I get 99% accuracy. And when I use those 4 important features I still get almost the same accuracy (which seems logical). But the thing is that when I use other features (removing those 4 features), I get around 95% accuracy which is lower but still is good. Is it logical or something might be wrong with my model? I use Random Forest as the model to compare the accuracies.

    • Jason Brownlee July 2, 2021 at 5:19 am #

      Yes, it means the other features are adding statistical noise or adding some value to the model.

  64. Martha July 21, 2021 at 8:11 pm #

    Hi jason,

    I love your work. I had a question regarding scikit learn Permutation Importance. I am using a Keras binary classification model, it gives the probability as its prediction and not the class value. So I was hoping if there is a way to not use Keras Wrapper class, and just modify the scorer function to get the feature importance. Can you tell me if that is indeed possible?

    Thanks

Leave a Reply