Last Updated on August 28, 2020

Many machine learning algorithms perform better when numerical input variables are scaled to a standard range.

This includes algorithms that use a weighted sum of the input, like linear regression, and algorithms that use distance measures, like k-nearest neighbors.

Standardizing is a popular scaling technique that subtracts the mean from values and divides by the standard deviation, transforming the probability distribution for an input variable to a standard Gaussian (zero mean and unit variance). Standardization can become skewed or biased if the input variable contains outlier values.

To overcome this, the median and interquartile range can be used when standardizing numerical input variables, generally referred to as robust scaling.

In this tutorial, you will discover how to use robust scaler transforms to standardize numerical input variables for classification and regression.

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

- Many machine learning algorithms prefer or perform better when numerical input variables are scaled.
- Robust scaling techniques that use percentiles can be used to scale numerical input variables that contain outliers.
- How to use the RobustScaler to scale numerical input variables using the median and interquartile range.

**Kick-start your project** with my new book Data Preparation for Machine Learning, including *step-by-step tutorials* and the *Python source code* files for all examples.

Letβs get started.

## Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into five parts; they are:

- Scaling Data
- Robust Scaler Transforms
- Sonar Dataset
- IQR Robust Scaler Transform
- Explore Robust Scaler Range

## Robust Scaling Data

It is common to scale data prior to fitting a machine learning model.

This is because data often consists of many different input variables or features (columns) and each may have a different range of values or units of measure, such as feet, miles, kilograms, dollars, etc.

If there are input variables that have very large values relative to the other input variables, these large values can dominate or skew some machine learning algorithms. The result is that the algorithms pay most of their attention to the large values and ignore the variables with smaller values.

This includes algorithms that use a weighted sum of inputs like linear regression, logistic regression, and artificial neural networks, as well as algorithms that use distance measures between examples, such as k-nearest neighbors and support vector machines.

As such, it is normal to scale input variables to a common range as a data preparation technique prior to fitting a model.

One approach to data scaling involves calculating the mean and standard deviation of each variable and using these values to scale the values to have a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one, a so-called “*standard normal*” probability distribution. This process is called standardization and is most useful when input variables have a Gaussian probability distribution.

Standardization is calculated by subtracting the mean value and dividing by the standard deviation.

- value = (value – mean) / stdev

Sometimes an input variable may have outlier values. These are values on the edge of the distribution that may have a low probability of occurrence, yet are overrepresented for some reason. Outliers can skew a probability distribution and make data scaling using standardization difficult as the calculated mean and standard deviation will be skewed by the presence of the outliers.

One approach to standardizing input variables in the presence of outliers is to ignore the outliers from the calculation of the mean and standard deviation, then use the calculated values to scale the variable.

This is called robust standardization or **robust data scaling**.

This can be achieved by calculating the median (50th percentile) and the 25th and 75th percentiles. The values of each variable then have their median subtracted and are divided by the interquartile range (IQR) which is the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles.

- value = (value – median) / (p75 – p25)

The resulting variable has a zero mean and median and a standard deviation of 1, although not skewed by outliers and the outliers are still present with the same relative relationships to other values.

### Want to Get Started With Data Preparation?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

## Robust Scaler Transforms

The robust scaler transform is available in the scikit-learn Python machine learning library via the RobustScaler class.

The “*with_centering*” argument controls whether the value is centered to zero (median is subtracted) and defaults to *True*.

The “*with_scaling*” argument controls whether the value is scaled to the IQR (standard deviation set to one) or not and defaults to *True*.

Interestingly, the definition of the scaling range can be specified via the “*quantile_range*” argument. It takes a tuple of two integers between 0 and 100 and defaults to the percentile values of the IQR, specifically (25, 75). Changing this will change the definition of outliers and the scope of the scaling.

We will take a closer look at how to use the robust scaler transforms on a real dataset.

First, let’s introduce a real dataset.

## Sonar Dataset

The sonar dataset is a standard machine learning dataset for binary classification.

It involves 60 real-valued inputs and a two-class target variable. There are 208 examples in the dataset and the classes are reasonably balanced.

A baseline classification algorithm can achieve a classification accuracy of about 53.4 percent using repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation. Top performance on this dataset is about 88 percent using repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation.

The dataset describes radar returns of rocks or simulated mines.

You can learn more about the dataset from here:

No need to download the dataset; we will download it automatically from our worked examples.

First, let’s load and summarize the dataset. The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
# load and summarize the sonar dataset from pandas import read_csv from pandas.plotting import scatter_matrix from matplotlib import pyplot # Load dataset url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/sonar.csv" dataset = read_csv(url, header=None) # summarize the shape of the dataset print(dataset.shape) # summarize each variable print(dataset.describe()) # histograms of the variables dataset.hist() pyplot.show() |

Running the example first summarizes the shape of the loaded dataset.

This confirms the 60 input variables, one output variable, and 208 rows of data.

A statistical summary of the input variables is provided showing that values are numeric and range approximately from 0 to 1.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
(208, 61) 0 1 2 ... 57 58 59 count 208.000000 208.000000 208.000000 ... 208.000000 208.000000 208.000000 mean 0.029164 0.038437 0.043832 ... 0.007949 0.007941 0.006507 std 0.022991 0.032960 0.038428 ... 0.006470 0.006181 0.005031 min 0.001500 0.000600 0.001500 ... 0.000300 0.000100 0.000600 25% 0.013350 0.016450 0.018950 ... 0.003600 0.003675 0.003100 50% 0.022800 0.030800 0.034300 ... 0.005800 0.006400 0.005300 75% 0.035550 0.047950 0.057950 ... 0.010350 0.010325 0.008525 max 0.137100 0.233900 0.305900 ... 0.044000 0.036400 0.043900 [8 rows x 60 columns] |

Finally, a histogram is created for each input variable.

If we ignore the clutter of the plots and focus on the histograms themselves, we can see that many variables have a skewed distribution.

The dataset provides a good candidate for using a robust scaler transform to standardize the data in the presence of skewed distributions and outliers.

Next, let’s fit and evaluate a machine learning model on the raw dataset.

We will use a k-nearest neighbor algorithm with default hyperparameters and evaluate it using repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation. The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 |
# evaluate knn on the raw sonar dataset from numpy import mean from numpy import std from pandas import read_csv from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score from sklearn.model_selection import RepeatedStratifiedKFold from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder from matplotlib import pyplot # load dataset url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/sonar.csv" dataset = read_csv(url, header=None) data = dataset.values # separate into input and output columns X, y = data[:, :-1], data[:, -1] # ensure inputs are floats and output is an integer label X = X.astype('float32') y = LabelEncoder().fit_transform(y.astype('str')) # define and configure the model model = KNeighborsClassifier() # evaluate the model cv = RepeatedStratifiedKFold(n_splits=10, n_repeats=3, random_state=1) n_scores = cross_val_score(model, X, y, scoring='accuracy', cv=cv, n_jobs=-1, error_score='raise') # report model performance print('Accuracy: %.3f (%.3f)' % (mean(n_scores), std(n_scores))) |

Running the example evaluates a KNN model on the raw sonar dataset.

We can see that the model achieved a mean classification accuracy of about 79.7 percent, showing that it has skill (better than 53.4 percent) and is in the ball-park of good performance (88 percent).

1 |
Accuracy: 0.797 (0.073) |

Next, let’s explore a robust scaling transform of the dataset.

## IQR Robust Scaler Transform

We can apply the robust scaler to the Sonar dataset directly.

We will use the default configuration and scale values to the IQR. First, a RobustScaler instance is defined with default hyperparameters. Once defined, we can call the *fit_transform()* function and pass it to our dataset to create a quantile transformed version of our dataset.

1 2 3 4 |
... # perform a robust scaler transform of the dataset trans = RobustScaler() data = trans.fit_transform(data) |

Let’s try it on our sonar dataset.

The complete example of creating a robust scaler transform of the sonar dataset and plotting histograms of the result is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 |
# visualize a robust scaler transform of the sonar dataset from pandas import read_csv from pandas import DataFrame from pandas.plotting import scatter_matrix from sklearn.preprocessing import RobustScaler from matplotlib import pyplot # load dataset url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/sonar.csv" dataset = read_csv(url, header=None) # retrieve just the numeric input values data = dataset.values[:, :-1] # perform a robust scaler transform of the dataset trans = RobustScaler() data = trans.fit_transform(data) # convert the array back to a dataframe dataset = DataFrame(data) # summarize print(dataset.describe()) # histograms of the variables dataset.hist() pyplot.show() |

Running the example first reports a summary of each input variable.

We can see that the distributions have been adjusted. The median values are now zero and the standard deviation values are now close to 1.0.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
0 1 ... 58 59 count 208.000000 208.000000 ... 2.080000e+02 208.000000 mean 0.286664 0.242430 ... 2.317814e-01 0.222527 std 1.035627 1.046347 ... 9.295312e-01 0.927381 min -0.959459 -0.958730 ... -9.473684e-01 -0.866359 25% -0.425676 -0.455556 ... -4.097744e-01 -0.405530 50% 0.000000 0.000000 ... 6.591949e-17 0.000000 75% 0.574324 0.544444 ... 5.902256e-01 0.594470 max 5.148649 6.447619 ... 4.511278e+00 7.115207 [8 rows x 60 columns] |

Histogram plots of the variables are created, although the distributions don’t look much different from their original distributions seen in the previous section.

Next, let’s evaluate the same KNN model as the previous section, but in this case on a robust scaler transform of the dataset.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 |
# evaluate knn on the sonar dataset with robust scaler transform from numpy import mean from numpy import std from pandas import read_csv from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score from sklearn.model_selection import RepeatedStratifiedKFold from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder from sklearn.preprocessing import RobustScaler from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline from matplotlib import pyplot # load dataset url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/sonar.csv" dataset = read_csv(url, header=None) data = dataset.values # separate into input and output columns X, y = data[:, :-1], data[:, -1] # ensure inputs are floats and output is an integer label X = X.astype('float32') y = LabelEncoder().fit_transform(y.astype('str')) # define the pipeline trans = RobustScaler(with_centering=False, with_scaling=True) model = KNeighborsClassifier() pipeline = Pipeline(steps=[('t', trans), ('m', model)]) # evaluate the pipeline cv = RepeatedStratifiedKFold(n_splits=10, n_repeats=3, random_state=1) n_scores = cross_val_score(pipeline, X, y, scoring='accuracy', cv=cv, n_jobs=-1, error_score='raise') # report pipeline performance print('Accuracy: %.3f (%.3f)' % (mean(n_scores), std(n_scores))) |

**Note**: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

Running the example, we can see that the robust scaler transform results in a lift in performance from 79.7 percent accuracy without the transform to about 81.9 percent with the transform.

1 |
Accuracy: 0.819 (0.076) |

Next, let’s explore the effect of different scaling ranges.

## Explore Robust Scaler Range

The range used to scale each variable is chosen by default as the IQR is bounded by the 25th and 75th percentiles.

This is specified by the “*quantile_range*” argument as a tuple.

Other values can be specified and might improve the performance of the model, such as a wider range, allowing fewer values to be considered outliers, or a more narrow range, allowing more values to be considered outliers.

The example below explores the effect of different definitions of the range from 1st to the 99th percentiles to 30th to 70th percentiles.

The complete example is listed below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 |
# explore the scaling range of the robust scaler transform from numpy import mean from numpy import std from pandas import read_csv from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score from sklearn.model_selection import RepeatedStratifiedKFold from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier from sklearn.preprocessing import RobustScaler from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline from matplotlib import pyplot # get the dataset def get_dataset(): # load dataset url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbrownlee/Datasets/master/sonar.csv" dataset = read_csv(url, header=None) data = dataset.values # separate into input and output columns X, y = data[:, :-1], data[:, -1] # ensure inputs are floats and output is an integer label X = X.astype('float32') y = LabelEncoder().fit_transform(y.astype('str')) return X, y # get a list of models to evaluate def get_models(): models = dict() for value in [1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30]: # define the pipeline trans = RobustScaler(quantile_range=(value, 100-value)) model = KNeighborsClassifier() models[str(value)] = Pipeline(steps=[('t', trans), ('m', model)]) return models # evaluate a give model using cross-validation def evaluate_model(model, X, y): cv = RepeatedStratifiedKFold(n_splits=10, n_repeats=3, random_state=1) scores = cross_val_score(model, X, y, scoring='accuracy', cv=cv, n_jobs=-1, error_score='raise') return scores # define dataset X, y = get_dataset() # get the models to evaluate models = get_models() # evaluate the models and store results results, names = list(), list() for name, model in models.items(): scores = evaluate_model(model, X, y) results.append(scores) names.append(name) print('>%s %.3f (%.3f)' % (name, mean(scores), std(scores))) # plot model performance for comparison pyplot.boxplot(results, labels=names, showmeans=True) pyplot.show() |

Running the example reports the mean classification accuracy for each value-defined IQR range.

**Note**: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

We can see that the default of 25th to 75th percentile achieves the best results, although the values of 20-80 and 30-70 achieve results that are very similar.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
>1 0.818 (0.069) >5 0.813 (0.085) >10 0.812 (0.076) >15 0.811 (0.081) >20 0.811 (0.080) >25 0.819 (0.076) >30 0.816 (0.072) |

Box and whisker plots are created to summarize the classification accuracy scores for each IQR range.

We can see a marked difference in the distribution and mean accuracy with the larger ranges of 25-75 and 30-70 percentiles.

## Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

### Tutorials

### APIs

- Standardization, or mean removal and variance scaling, scikit-learn.
- sklearn.preprocessing.RobustScaler API.

### Articles

## Summary

In this tutorial, you discovered how to use robust scaler transforms to standardize numerical input variables for classification and regression.

Specifically, you learned:

- Many machine learning algorithms prefer or perform better when numerical input variables are scaled.
- Robust scaling techniques that use percentiles can be used to scale numerical input variables that contain outliers.
- How to use the RobustScaler to scale numerical input variables using the median and interquartile range.

**Do you have any questions?**

Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Hi Jason

Is there a difference between doing transforming for a dataset before and after splitting data?

Thank you*

*btw, so far I have bought 18 ebooks of yours and I am a monthly patron, I encourage everyone to do so. You are doing absolutely amazing job for which he deserves full recognition and support.

Yes.

We must prepare the data transform on the training dataset only, otherwise we risk data leakage and in turn results we cannot trust:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/data-leakage-machine-learning/

Does that help?

Thanks again for your support. It’s greatly appreciated!

I’m happy to help.

OK, so let’s say I have done the splitting like this

60% – Training

20% – Validation

20% – Test/holdout

so in model.fit() I will be using the Training and Validation.

Now, Shall I prepare the data transform .fit_transform() on the training dataset only? or Training and Validation together?

btw, I started to use a web browser extension to block out distractions and stay focused on your website. so expect to see from me more questions π

Thanks again for your support. Itβs greatly appreciated!

Train only.

Hi ,Jason.

Thanks for great post.

I am confused here, where you split the dataset into train and test dataset.

Thanks

Jon

We use k fold cross validation in this tutorial, learn about it here:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/k-fold-cross-validation/

When you train a model with data that has been scaled, transformed, etc., when the model is in production, do you have to apply the same preparations to your production data before sending them through the model for predictions?

Yes, exactly!

See this:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/how-to-save-and-load-models-and-data-preparation-in-scikit-learn-for-later-use/

Thank you. The follow-up article is very helpful.

When we’re considering 50% percentile i.e; mean…

Purpose of using the 25% and 75% and the Interquartile Range is it to increase the accuracy ?

Sorry, I don’t undertand. Can you please elaborate or rephrase your question?

Hello Jason,

Thanks for the nice post. Do you know of a similar function in any library in R?

Thank you.

I may, you will have to search the blog, sorry. I have not used R in many years now.

Wonderful article!

You said that linear regression is an example of a model that is impacted negatively by features with different scales. However, if one feature is on a scale several orders of magnitude larger than the others, won’t the parameter attached to that feature be much smaller to compensate?

Yes, it will work had to make that so, although the optimization problem is more stable/faster if inputs have the same scale.

Hello Jason,

I think that formula for robust scaling is not

value = (value β median) / (p75 β p25) but

value = (value β p25) / (p75 β p25)

because it is similar as min-max normalization (value = (value β min) / (max β min)).

Do you agree and if you don’t, can you provide references?

I believe it is correct. E.g. subtract the central tendency and divide by the range.

You can see the implementation here:

https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/blob/0fb307bf3/sklearn/preprocessing/_data.py#L1241

Yes, you are right, thanks

You’re welcome.