Last Updated on August 6, 2019

Training a deep neural network that can generalize well to new data is a challenging problem.

A model with too little capacity cannot learn the problem, whereas a model with too much capacity can learn it too well and overfit the training dataset. Both cases result in a model that does not generalize well.

A modern approach to reducing generalization error is to use a larger model that may be required to use regularization during training that keeps the weights of the model small. These techniques not only reduce overfitting, but they can also lead to faster optimization of the model and better overall performance.

In this post, you will discover the problem of overfitting when training neural networks and how it can be addressed with regularization methods.

After reading this post, you will know:

- Underfitting can easily be addressed by increasing the capacity of the network, but overfitting requires the use of specialized techniques.
- Regularization methods like weight decay provide an easy way to control overfitting for large neural network models.
- A modern recommendation for regularization is to use early stopping with dropout and a weight constraint.

**Kick-start your project** with my new book Better Deep Learning, including *step-by-step tutorials* and the *Python source code* files for all examples.

Let’s get started.

## Overview

This tutorial is divided into four parts; they are:

- The Problem of Model Generalization and Overfitting
- Reduce Overfitting by Constraining Model Complexity
- Methods for Regularization
- Regularization Recommendations

## The Problem of Model Generalization and Overfitting

The objective of a neural network is to have a final model that performs well both on the data that we used to train it (e.g. the training dataset) and the new data on which the model will be used to make predictions.

The central challenge in machine learning is that we must perform well on new, previously unseen inputs — not just those on which our model was trained. The ability to perform well on previously unobserved inputs is called generalization.

— Page 110, Deep Learning, 2016.

We require that the model learn from known examples and generalize from those known examples to new examples in the future. We use methods like a train/test split or k-fold cross-validation only to estimate the ability of the model to generalize to new data.

Learning and also generalizing to new cases is hard.

Too little learning and the model will perform poorly on the training dataset and on new data. The model will underfit the problem. Too much learning and the model will perform well on the training dataset and poorly on new data, the model will overfit the problem. In both cases, the model has not generalized.

**Underfit Model**. A model that fails to sufficiently learn the problem and performs poorly on a training dataset and does not perform well on a holdout sample.**Overfit Model**. A model that learns the training dataset too well, performing well on the training dataset but does not perform well on a hold out sample.**Good Fit Model**. A model that suitably learns the training dataset and generalizes well to the old out dataset.

A model fit can be considered in the context of the bias-variance trade-off.

An underfit model has high bias and low variance. Regardless of the specific samples in the training data, it cannot learn the problem. An overfit model has low bias and high variance. The model learns the training data too well and performance varies widely with new unseen examples or even statistical noise added to examples in the training dataset.

In order to generalize well, a system needs to be sufficiently powerful to approximate the target function. If it is too simple to fit even the training data then generalization to new data is also likely to be poor. […] An overly complex system, however, may be able to approximate the data in many different ways that give similar errors and is unlikely to choose the one that will generalize best …

— Page 241, Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 1999.

We can address underfitting by increasing the capacity of the model. Capacity refers to the ability of a model to fit a variety of functions; more capacity, means that a model can fit more types of functions for mapping inputs to outputs. Increasing the capacity of a model is easily achieved by changing the structure of the model, such as adding more layers and/or more nodes to layers.

Because an underfit model is so easily addressed, it is more common to have an overfit model.

An overfit model is easily diagnosed by monitoring the performance of the model during training by evaluating it on both a training dataset and on a holdout validation dataset. Graphing line plots of the performance of the model during training, called learning curves, will show a familiar pattern.

For example, line plots of the loss (that we seek to minimize) of the model on train and validation datasets will show a line for the training dataset that drops and may plateau and a line for the validation dataset that drops at first, then at some point begins to rise again.

As training progresses, the generalization error may decrease to a minimum and then increase again as the network adapts to idiosyncrasies of the training data.

— Page 250, Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 1999.

A learning curve plot tells the story of the model learning the problem until a point at which it begins overfitting and its ability to generalize to the unseen validation dataset begins to get worse.

### Want Better Results with Deep Learning?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

## Reduce Overfitting by Constraining Model Complexity

There are two ways to approach an overfit model:

- Reduce overfitting by training the network on more examples.
- Reduce overfitting by changing the complexity of the network.

A benefit of very deep neural networks is that their performance continues to improve as they are fed larger and larger datasets. A model with a near-infinite number of examples will eventually plateau in terms of what the capacity of the network is capable of learning.

A model can overfit a training dataset because it has sufficient capacity to do so. Reducing the capacity of the model reduces the likelihood of the model overfitting the training dataset, to a point where it no longer overfits.

The capacity of a neural network model, it’s complexity, is defined by both it’s structure in terms of nodes and layers and the parameters in terms of its weights. Therefore, we can reduce the complexity of a neural network to reduce overfitting in one of two ways:

- Change network complexity by changing the network structure (number of weights).
- Change network complexity by changing the network parameters (values of weights).

In the case of neural networks, the complexity can be varied by changing the number of adaptive parameters in the network. This is called structural stabilization. […] The second principal approach to controlling the complexity of a model is through the use of regularization which involves the addition of a penalty term to the error function.

— Page 332, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 1995.

For example, the structure could be tuned such as via grid search until a suitable number of nodes and/or layers is found to reduce or remove overfitting for the problem. Alternately, the model could be overfit and pruned by removing nodes until it achieves suitable performance on a validation dataset.

It is more common to instead constrain the complexity of the model by ensuring the parameters (weights) of the model remain small. Small parameters suggest a less complex and, in turn, more stable model that is less sensitive to statistical fluctuations in the input data.

Large weighs tend to cause sharp transitions in the [activation] functions and thus large changes in output for small changes in inputs.

— Page 269, Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 1999.

It is more common to focus on methods that constrain the size of the weights in a neural network because a single network structure can be defined that is under-constrained, e.g. has a much larger capacity than is required for the problem, and regularization can be used during training to ensure that the model does not overfit. In such cases, performance can even be better as the additional capacity can be focused on better learning generalizable concepts in the problem.

Techniques that seek to reduce overfitting (reduce generalization error) by keeping network weights small are referred to as regularization methods. More specifically, regularization refers to a class of approaches that add additional information to transform an ill-posed problem into a more stable well-posed problem.

A problem is said to be ill-posed if small changes in the given information cause large changes in the solution. This instability with respect to the data makes solutions unreliable because small measurement errors or uncertainties in parameters may be greatly magnified and lead to wildly different responses. […] The idea behind regularization is to use supplementary information to restate an ill-posed problem in a stable form.

— Page 266, Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 1999.

Regularization methods are so widely used to reduce overfitting that the term “*regularization*” may be used for any method that improves the generalization error of a neural network model.

Regularization is any modification we make to a learning algorithm that is intended to reduce its generalization error but not its training error. Regularization is one of the central concerns of the field of machine learning, rivaled in its importance only by optimization.

— Page 120, Deep Learning, 2016.

## Regularization Methods for Neural Networks

The simplest and perhaps most common regularization method is to add a penalty to the loss function in proportion to the size of the weights in the model.

**Weight Regularization (weight decay)**: Penalize the model during training based on the magnitude of the weights.

This will encourage the model to map the inputs to the outputs of the training dataset in such a way that the weights of the model are kept small. This approach is called weight regularization or weight decay and has proven very effective for decades for both simpler linear models and neural networks.

A simple alternative to gathering more data is to reduce the size of the model or improve regularization, by adjusting hyperparameters such as weight decay coefficients …

— Page 427, Deep Learning, 2016.

Below is a list of five of the most common additional regularization methods.

**Activity Regularization**: Penalize the model during training base on the magnitude of the activations.**Weight Constraint**: Constrain the magnitude of weights to be within a range or below a limit.**Dropout**: Probabilistically remove inputs during training.**Noise**: Add statistical noise to inputs during training.**Early Stopping**: Monitor model performance on a validation set and stop training when performance degrades.

Most of these methods have been demonstrated (or proven) to approximate the effect of adding a penalty to the loss function.

Each method approaches the problem differently, offering benefits in terms of a mixture of generalization performance, configurability, and/or computational complexity.

## Regularization Recommendations

This section outlines some recommendations for using regularization methods for deep learning neural networks.

You should always consider using regularization, unless you have a very large dataset, e.g. big-data scale.

Unless your training set contains tens of millions of examples or more, you should include some mild forms of regularization from the start.

— Page 426, Deep Learning, 2016.

A good general recommendation is to design a neural network structure that is under-constrained and to use regularization to reduce the likelihood of overfitting.

… controlling the complexity of the model is not a simple matter of finding the model of the right size, with the right number of parameters. Instead, … in practical deep learning scenarios, we almost always do find—that the best fitting model (in the sense of minimizing generalization error) is a large model that has been regularized appropriately.

— Page 229, Deep Learning, 2016.

Early stopping should almost universally be used in addition to a method to keep weights small during training.

Early stopping should be used almost universally.

— Page 426, Deep Learning, 2016.

Some more specific recommendations include:

**Classical**: use early stopping and weight decay (L2 weight regularization).**Alternate**: use early stopping and added noise with a weight constraint.**Modern**: use early stopping and dropout, in addition to a weight constraint.

These recommendations would suit Multilayer Perceptrons and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Some recommendations for recurrent neural nets include:

**Classical**: use early stopping with added weight noise and a weight constraint such as maximum norm.**Modern**: use early stopping with a backpropagation-through-time-aware version of dropout and a weight constraint.

There are no silver bullets when it comes to regularization and systematic experimentation is strongly encouraged.

## Further Reading

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

### Books

- Chapter 7 Regularization for Deep Learning, Deep Learning, 2016.
- Section 5.5. Regularization in Neural Networks, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, 2006.
- Chapter 16, Heuristics for Improving Generalization, Neural Smithing: Supervised Learning in Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks, 1999.
- Chapter 9 Learning and Generalization, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 1995.

### Articles

- What is overfitting and how can I avoid it? Neural Network FAQ.
- Regularization (mathematics), Wikipedia.

## Summary

In this post, you discovered the problem of overfitting when training neural networks and how it can be addressed with regularization methods.

Specifically, you learned:

- Underfitting can easily be addressed by increasing the capacity of the network, but overfitting requires the use of specialized techniques.
- Regularization methods like weight decay provide an easy way to control overfitting for large neural network models.
- A modern recommendation for regularization is to use early stopping with dropout and a weight constraint.

Do you have any questions?

Ask your questions in the comments below and I will do my best to answer.

Jo thanks für the post. However, did you mistake loss and accuracy on your three plots about overfitting / underfitting and good fit?

No, but they are maximizing (accuracy) rather than minimizing (loss). Perhaps that is confusing

I think the confusion is that they are showing accuracy but are labelled “loss” then…

Yep. The graphs are no good.

I’ve deleted them.

Couldn’t underfitting be simply because of there not being enough data, instead of its being because of network capacity constraints?

No, if there is not enough data you would overfit.

great concept summary about underfitting and overfitting in machine learning, and the idea behind this that to get many (superfluous and irrelevant) details about something many times means lost main stream concepts (generalization)…

Also, always I approach this issue I can not avoid to think in the idea content within the old proverb that “people who knows a lot of something (“overfitting approach”) knows nothing about many things (“generalization capacity”) … 🙂

thanks you for sharing these tutorials

JG

Nice

Yes, reminds me of: the fox knows many things, the hedgehog knows one big thing.

One question Jason, where to put the common used techniques of data augmentation under overfitting techniques?

– as a way to increase data input, but with the same data (appearing as new data), or

– as a way of regularization (to get better generalization eliminating data details that does not contribute to get the patterns? )

thanks

JG

It does both things, improved training via more training data and a mild regularizing effect.

sir as i have communicated a paper in journal got following revisions

Optimising epochs – May be epoch does not need to be optimised as the model training could be stopped when the validation loss plateaus, which may happen at different epoch depending on the optimiser and or the dataset used.

The above may justify why the SGD optimiser might not have converged at 200 epochs, which was selected by the GSO (See Fig 5). The authors need to justify why they chose to optimise epoch.

Thanks for sharing.

Hi Jason,

I have maybe a “problem” but not sure if my idea is correct. I have developed an MLP that has been trained with imbalanced data in which I have applied different strategies to avoid this problem.

If at test stage, I used a set of the original dataset before applying the balanced techniques. Am I avoiding overfitting?

Thanks a lot.

Kind regards.

You can tell if your neural net is overfitting by looking at learning curves:

https://machinelearningmastery.com/learning-curves-for-diagnosing-machine-learning-model-performance/

Yes, I know. What I mean, if there is any strategy of which is the best data to do validation when your initial dataset was imbalanced and you have done data augmentation with SNOTE or others and now have artificial data also.

Thanks again.

A random sample, repeated to avoid bias. Ideally repeated k-fold cross validation.

hi Jason,

do you have any examples for the last recommendations?

Some recommendations for recurrent neural nets include:

• Classical: use early stopping with added weight noise and a weight constraint such as maximum norm.

• Modern: use early stopping with a backpropagation-through-time-aware version of dropout and a weight constraint.

Yes, you can search on the blog for examples.

https://github.com/omar16100/Movielens-Recommender-System-Keras/blob/master/movie_recsys.ipynb,this model is overfit after i have use it in my dataset.Could u tell me how to address it?

Perhaps try some of the method described above.

Hi Jason,

thanks for the article.

When I handle the deep learning overfitting, very often I came across the situation that after adding dropout or L2 and L1 regularisation, the training data loss gets bigger but validation data has no improvement as well. Could you give me some hint regarding such a situation? Thanks a lot.

Adding regularization may require a smaller learning rate and more training epochs. E.g. changing one thing along is not sufficient.

Thank you Jason fot the impressive subject

I want to know if oversaturated model equal to overfitting

and if using resampling techniques like K-fold cv and loocv combined with grid search can help to avoid overfitting

What does “oversaturated” mean in machine learning?

I found in some comments that means overparametrised

Great!

Great summary !

Thanks!

Hello Jason,

Thanks for the blog. If I have to select the most efficient way to reduce overfitting for XGBoost-based regression from the following choices

1. Gather data or data augmentation (you have covered this in one of your blogs)

2. Feature selection

3. Dropout

4. Random forest

What would it be and why?

I’d appreciate your thoughts.

I don’t believe you can use dropout in xgboost, that method is for neural networks.

Early stopping is a good method to reduce overfitting in xgboost models.

xgboost 1.5.0 (see https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/latest/parameter.html) has DART implementation in it. (There are other dropout tree algorithms out there too.) I’ve found Dart occasionally useful: Random forest pretty much never.

For GBM methods in particular, feature selection is probably the most useful, because while xgboost does have alpha and lambda and gamma, it can struggle to completely omit noisy variables on noisy problems.

But probably the most useful choice is: 0) understand your data.

Thanks for sharing.

Hi Jason,

Thanks for this introduction.

I have 3 questions to ask about.

The first one is does ‘4.Noise: Add statistical noise to inputs during training.’ as one of additional regularization approach (as a way of Data Augmentation) in your paper equals to the sentence ‘1.Reduce overfitting by training the network on more examples.’ under the subtitle ‘Reduce Overfitting by Constraining Model Complexity’? If not what is their relationship and do you mind to explain more detail about the second sentence?

The second one is that does ‘1.Change network complexity by changing the network structure (number of weights).’ mean the method of ‘Simplifying The Model’ we often say via simply remove layers or reduce the number of neurons to make the network smaller?

The last question is that do the additional regularization approaches 1 Activity Regularization and 2 Weight Constraint correspond to what we often call L1 and L2 respectively?

Best wishes,

Hi Muhan…Please reduce down to a concise question so that may better assist you.