Use the offer code 20offearlybird to get 20% off. Hurry, sale ends soon!

# Growing and Pruning Ensembles in Python

Ensemble member selection refers to algorithms that optimize the composition of an ensemble.

This may involve growing an ensemble from available models or pruning members from a fully defined ensemble.

The goal is often to reduce the model or computational complexity of an ensemble with little or no effect on the performance of an ensemble, and in some cases find a combination of ensemble members that results in better performance than blindly using all contributing models directly.

In this tutorial, you will discover how to develop ensemble selection algorithms from scratch.

After completing this tutorial, you will know:

• Ensemble selection involves choosing a subset of ensemble members that results in lower complexity than using all members and sometimes better performance.
• How to develop and evaluate a greedy ensemble pruning algorithm for classification.
• How to develop and evaluate an algorithm for greedily growing an ensemble from scratch.

Kick-start your project with my new book Ensemble Learning Algorithms With Python, including step-by-step tutorials and the Python source code files for all examples.

Letâ€™s get started.

Growing and Pruning Ensembles in Python
Photo by FaBio C, some rights reserved.

## Tutorial Overview

This tutorial is divided into four parts; they are:

1. Ensemble Member Selection
2. Baseline Models and Voting
3. Ensemble Pruning Example
4. Ensemble Growing Example

## Ensemble Member Selection

Voting and stacking ensembles typically combine the predictions from a heterogeneous group of model types.

Although the ensemble may have a large number of ensemble members, it is hard to know that the best combination of members is being used by the ensemble. For example, instead of simply using all members, it is possible that better results could be achieved by adding one more different model type or removing one or more models.

This can be addressed using a weighted average ensemble and using an optimization algorithm to find an appropriate weighting for each member, allowing some members to have a zero weight, which effectively removes them from the ensemble. The problem with a weighted average ensemble is that all models remain part of the ensemble, perhaps requiring an ensemble of greater complexity than is required to be developed and maintained.

An alternative approach is to optimize the composition of the ensemble itself. The general approach of automatically choosing or optimizing the members of ensembles is referred to as ensemble selection.

Two common approaches include ensemble growing and ensemble pruning.

• Ensemble Growing: Add members to the ensemble until no further improvement is observed.
• Ensemble Pruning: Remove members from the ensemble until no further improvement is observed.

Ensemble growing is a technique where the model starts with no members and involves adding new members until no further improvement is observed. This could be performed in a greedy manner where members are added one at a time only if they result in an improvement in model performance.

Ensemble pruning is a technique where the model starts with all possible members that are being considered and removes members from the ensemble until no further improvement is observed. This could be performed in a greedy manner where members are removed one at a time and only if their removal results in a lift in the performance of the overall ensemble.

Given a set of trained individual learners, rather than combining all of them, ensemble pruning tries to select a subset of individual learners to comprise the ensemble.

— Page 119, Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms, 2012.

An advantage of ensemble pruning and growing is that it may result in an ensemble with a smaller size (lower complexity) and/or an ensemble with better predictive performance. Sometimes a small drop in performance is desirable if it can be achieved in a large drop in model complexity and resulting maintenance burden. Alternately, on some projects, predictive skill is more important than all other concerns, and ensemble selection provides one more strategy to try and get the most out of the contributing models.

There are two main reasons for reducing the ensemble size: a) Reducing computational overhead: Smaller ensembles require less computational overhead and b) Improving Accuracy: Some members in the ensemble may reduce the predictive performance of the whole.

— Page 119, Pattern Classification Using Ensemble Methods, 2010.

Ensemble growing might be preferred for computational efficiency reasons in cases where a small number of ensemble members are expected to perform better, whereas ensemble pruning would be more efficient in cases where a large number of ensemble members may be expected to perform better.

Simple greedy ensemble growing and pruning have a lot in common with stepwise feature selection techniques, such as those used in regression (e.g. so-called stepwise regression).

More sophisticated techniques may be used, such as selecting members for addition to or removal from the ensemble based on their standalone performance on the dataset, or even through the use of a global search procedure that attempts to find a combination of ensemble members that results in the best overall performance.

… one can perform a heuristic search in the space of the possible different ensemble subsets while evaluating the collective merit of a candidate subset.

— Page 123, Pattern Classification Using Ensemble Methods, 2010.

Now that we are familiar with ensemble selection methods, let’s explore how we might implement ensemble pruning and ensemble growing in scikit-learn.

### Want to Get Started With Ensemble Learning?

Take my free 7-day email crash course now (with sample code).

Click to sign-up and also get a free PDF Ebook version of the course.

## Baseline Models and Voting

Before we dive into developing growing and pruning ensembles, let’s first establish a dataset and baseline.

We will use a synthetic binary classification problem as the basis for this investigation, defined by the make_classification() function with 5,000 examples and 20 numerical input features.

The example below defines the dataset and summarizes its size.

Running the example creates the dataset in a repeatable manner and reports the number of rows and input features, matching our expectations.

Next, we can choose some candidate models that will provide the basis for our ensemble.

We will use five standard machine learning models, including logistic regression, naive Bayes, decision tree, support vector machine, and a k-nearest neighbor algorithm.

First, we can define a function that will create each model with default hyperparameters. Each model will be defined as a tuple with a name and the model object, then added to a list. This is a helpful structure both for enumerating the models with their names for standalone evaluation and for later use in an ensemble.

The get_models() function below implements this and returns the list of models to consider.

We can then define a function that takes a single model and the dataset and evaluates the performance of the model on the dataset. We will evaluate a model using repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation with 10 folds and three repeats, a good practice in machine learning.

The evaluate_model() function below implements this and returns a list of scores across all folds and repeats.

We can then create the list of models and enumerate them, reporting the performance of each on the synthetic dataset in turn.

Tying this together, the complete example is listed below.

Running the example evaluates each standalone machine learning algorithm on the synthetic binary classification dataset.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case, we can see that both the KNN and SVM models perform the best on this dataset, achieving a mean classification accuracy of about 95.3 percent.

These results provide a baseline in performance that we require any ensemble to exceed in order to be considered useful on this dataset.

A figure is created showing box and whisker plots of the distribution of accuracy scores for each algorithm.

We can see that the KNN and SVM algorithms perform much better than the other algorithms, although all algorithms are skillful in different ways. This may make them good candidates to consider in an ensemble.

Box and Whisker Plots of Classification Accuracy for Standalone Machine Learning Models

Next, we need to establish a baseline ensemble that uses all models. This will provide a point of comparison with growing and pruning methods that seek better performance with a smaller subset of models.

In this case, we will use a voting ensemble with soft voting. This means that each model will predict probabilities and the probabilities will be summed by the ensemble model to choose a final output prediction for each input sample.

This can be achieved using the VotingClassifier class where the members are set via the “estimators” argument, which expects a list of models where each model is a tuple with a name and configured model object, just as we defined in the previous section.

We can then set the type of voting to perform via the “voting” argument, which in this case is set to “soft.”

Tying this together, the example below evaluates a voting ensemble of all five models on the synthetic binary classification dataset.

Running the example evaluates the soft voting ensemble of all models using repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation and reports the mean accuracy across all folds and repeats.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case, we can see that the voting ensemble achieved a mean accuracy of about 92.8 percent. This is lower than SVM and KNN models used alone that achieved an accuracy of about 95.3 percent.

This result highlights that a simple voting ensemble of all models results in a model with higher complexity and worse performance in this case. Perhaps we can find a subset of members that performs better than any single model and has lower complexity than simply using all models.

Next, we will explore pruning members from the ensemble.

## Ensemble Pruning Example

In this section, we will explore how to develop a greedy ensemble pruning algorithm from scratch.

We will use a greedy algorithm in this case, which is straightforward to implement. This involves removing one member from the ensemble and evaluating the performance and repeating this for each member in the ensemble. The member that, if removed, results in the best improvement in performance is then permanently removed from the ensemble and the process repeats. This continues until no further improvements can be achieved.

It is referred to as a “greedy” algorithm because it seeks the best improvement at each step. It is possible that the best combination of members is not on the path of greedy improvements, in which case the greedy algorithm will not find it and a global optimization algorithm could be used instead.

First, we can define a function to evaluate a candidate list of models. This function will take the list of models and the dataset and construct a voting ensemble from the list of models and evaluate its performance using repeated stratified k-fold cross-validation, returning the mean classification accuracy.

This function can be used to evaluate each candidateâ€™s removal from the ensemble. The evaluate_ensemble() function below implements this.

Next, we can define a function that performs a single round of pruning.

First, a baseline in performance is established with all models that are currently in the ensemble. Then the list of models is enumerated and each is removed in turn, and the effect of removing the model is evaluated on the ensemble. If the removal results in an improvement in performance, the new score and specific model that was removed is recorded.

Importantly, the trial removal is performed on a copy of the list of models, not on the main list of models itself. This is to ensure we only remove an ensemble member from the list once we know it will result in the best possible improvement from all the members that could potentially be removed at the current step.

The prune_round() function below implements this given the list of current models in the ensemble and dataset, and returns the improvement in score (if any) and the best model to remove to achieve that score.

Next, we need to drive the pruning process.

This involves running a round of pruning until no further improvement in accuracy is achieved by calling the prune_round() function repeatedly.

If the function returns None for the model to be removed, we know that no single greedy improvement is possible and we can return the final list of models. Otherwise, the chosen model is removed from the ensemble and the process continues.

The prune_ensemble() function below implements this and returns the models to use in the final ensemble and the score that it achieved via our evaluation procedure.

We can tie all of this together into an example of ensemble pruning on the synthetic binary classification dataset.

Running the example performs the ensemble pruning process, reporting which model was removed each round and the accuracy of the model once the model was removed.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case, we can see that three rounds of pruning were performed, removing the naive Bayes, decision tree, and logistic regression algorithms, leaving only the SVM and KNN algorithms that achieved a mean classification accuracy of about 95.7 percent. This is better than the 95.3 percent achieved by SVM and KNN used in a standalone manner, and clearly better than combining all models together.

The final list of models could then be used in a new final voting ensemble model via the “estimators” argument, fit on the entire dataset and used to make a prediction on new data.

Now that we are familiar with developing and evaluating an ensemble pruning method, let’s look at the reverse case of growing the ensemble members.

## Ensemble Growing Example

In this section, we will explore how to develop a greedy ensemble growing algorithm from scratch.

The structure of greedily growing an ensemble is much like the greedy pruning of members, although in reverse. We start with an ensemble with no models and add a single model that has the best performance. Models are then added one by one only if they result in a lift in performance over the ensemble before the model was added.

Much of the code is the same as the pruning case so we can focus on the differences.

First, we must define a function to perform one round of growing the ensemble. This involves enumerating all candidate models that could be added and evaluating the effect of adding each in turn to the ensemble. The single model that results in the biggest improvement is then returned by the function, along with its score.

The grow_round() function below implements this behavior.

Next, we need a function to drive the growing procedure.

This involves a loop that runs rounds of growing until no further additions can be made resulting in an improvement in model performance. For each addition that can be made, the main list of models in the ensemble is updated and the list of models currently in the ensemble is reported along with the performance.

The grow_ensemble() function implements this and returns the list of models greedily determined to result in the best performance along with the expected mean accuracy.

Tying this together, the complete example of greedy ensemble growing on the synthetic binary classification dataset is listed below.

Running the example incrementally adds one model at a time to the ensemble and reports the mean classification accuracy of the ensemble of the models.

Note: Your results may vary given the stochastic nature of the algorithm or evaluation procedure, or differences in numerical precision. Consider running the example a few times and compare the average outcome.

In this case, we can see that ensemble growing found the same solution as greedy ensemble pruning where an ensemble of SVM and KNN achieved a mean classification accuracy of about 95.6 percent, an improvement over any single standalone model and over combining all models.

This section provides more resources on the topic if you are looking to go deeper.

## Summary

In this tutorial, you discovered how to develop ensemble selection algorithms from scratch.

Specifically, you learned:

• Ensemble selection involves choosing a subset of ensemble members that results in lower complexity than using all members and sometimes better performance.
• How to develop and evaluate a greedy ensemble pruning algorithm for classification.
• How to develop and evaluate an algorithm for greedily growing an ensemble from scratch.

Do you have any questions?

## Get a Handle on Modern Ensemble Learning!

#### Improve Your Predictions in Minutes

...with just a few lines of python code

Discover how in my new Ebook:
Ensemble Learning Algorithms With Python

It provides self-study tutorials with full working code on:
Stacking, Voting, Boosting, Bagging, Blending, Super Learner, and much more...

### 15 Responses to Growing and Pruning Ensembles in Python

1. Nandan Kakadiya April 30, 2021 at 8:31 pm #

Thank you so much Jason sir for this amazing information. Looking forward to more amazing tutorial and articles like these.

2. John Lee May 1, 2021 at 7:10 pm #

Interesting and helpful article! Is there any approach to learn the optimal weighting in ensemble instead of a simple voting mechanism? (e.g. Use another model to learn the weighting of ensemble models so as to deliver better performance?) If yes, did this blog already have a post to cover this research work or discussion? Look forward to your future tutorials and sharing.

3. sazang January 5, 2022 at 12:28 am #

Thank you so much for you sharing!But I have a question. In you article, soft voting are use to be an ensemble learning example. But, when I used soft-weighted, the weights of base classifications is unavaliable. How can I set a weights for soft-weighted voting? I am looking forward you reply! Thanks again!

4. sazang January 5, 2022 at 12:50 pm #

Thank you very much for you sharing! In you article, the soft voting were used. But, a question, how can i set the weights for soft-weighted voting model?

5. sazang January 5, 2022 at 12:51 pm #

Looking forward to you relpy!

6. za sha January 5, 2022 at 1:00 pm #

Thanks for you sharing! I want to kown how to set the weights of soft-weighted voting, cause I need to use the soft-weighted voting to predict and I have tried to set but failed. Can you give some good advices? Looking foaward to you reply! Thanks again!

7. za sha January 6, 2022 at 8:28 pm #